Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valsecchi, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Masera, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valsecchi, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Masera, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 7:1005-1008, 1996
© 1996 European Society for Medical Oncology


other

A new challenge in clinical research in childhood ALL: The prospective meta-analysis strategy for intergroup collaboration

M. G. Valsecchi1, and G. Masera2

1Instituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Università di Milano Milano
2Clinica Pediatrica, Univcrsità di Milano, Ospedale S. Gerardo Monza, Italy

Correspondence to: Maria Grazia Valsecchi, MD Istituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria Via Venezian, 1 20133 Milan, Italy

We consider the problems arising in clinical research on childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Given the therapeutic progress achieved over the last few decades, any improvement in the outcome for the majority of children with ALL is dficult to assess with the usual size trials. Furthermore, the progress in genetics and molecular biology has now led to the identillcation of subgroups of children, typically with rare characteristics, for whom new treatments still await evaluation. For both these aspects of clinical research, there is an increasing need for international intergroup cooperation.

After a discussion on the role of retrospective meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials in ALL research, we suggest that intergroup studies could be made more feasible, but still scientifically rigorous, by adopting a strategy of prospective meta-analysis. This strategy can be described as follows: i) different groups prospectively plan to ask the same randomized question within their protocols which may differ in other aspects, and to pool their data in order to evaluate treatment effect; ii) the management of the study can be de-centralized, by allowing each group to be responsible for conducting its own protocol.

We would like to stimulate the debate on the methodological and practical aspects of research perspectives in ALL (and in pediatric oncology).

intergroup trials, pediatric oncology, prospective meta-analysis, randomized trials


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Pession, M. G. Valsecchi, G. Masera, W. A. Kamps, E. Magyarosy, C. Rizzari, E. R. van Wering, L. Lo Nigro, A. van der Does, F. Locatelli, et al.
Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial on Extended Use of High Dose L-Asparaginase for Standard Risk Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2005; 23(28): 7161 - 7167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Arico, M. G. Valsecchi, B. Camitta, M. Schrappe, J. Chessells, A. Baruchel, P. Gaynon, L. Silverman, G. Janka-Schaub, W. Kamps, et al.
Outcome of Treatment in Children with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
N. Engl. J. Med., April 6, 2000; 342(14): 998 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. A. Berlin and G. A. Colditz
The Role of Meta-analysis in the Regulatory Process for Foods, Drugs, and Devices
JAMA, March 3, 1999; 281(9): 830 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.