Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on May 22, 2009
Annals of Oncology 2009 20(8):1303-1317; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn796
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/8/1303    most recent
mdn796v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terpos, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sonneveld, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terpos, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sonneveld, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow 2009 - Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

reviews

The use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: recommendations of an expert panel on behalf of the European Myeloma Network

E. Terpos1,2,*, O. Sezer3, P. I. Croucher4, R. García-Sanz5, M. Boccadoro6, J. San Miguel5, J. Ashcroft7, J. Bladé8,9, M. Cavo10, M. Delforge11, M.-A. Dimopoulos1, T. Facon12, M. Macro13, A. Waage14 and P. Sonneveld15

1 Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens School of Medicine, Alexandra University Hospital, Athens, Greece
2 Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine Imperial College London, London, UK
3 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
4 Unit of Bone Biology, Division of Clinical Sciences (South), University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
5 Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca and Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
6 Division of Hematology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy
7 Department of Hematology, Pinderfields Hospital, Mid-Yorkshire NHS Trust and University of Leeds, Wakefield, UK
8 Department of Hematology, Hospital Clinic I Provincial, Barcelona
9 Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Agustí Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
10 Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology "Seràgnoli", Bologna University School of Medicine, S.Orsola's University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
11 Department of Hematology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
12 Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU, Lille
13 Department of Clinical Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
14 Department of Hematology, St Olavs Hospital/NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
15 Department of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

* Correspondence to: Dr E. Terpos, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens School of Medicine, Alexandra University Hospital, 5 Marathonomahon Street, Drossia, 14572, Athens, Greece. Tel: +30-210-7463803; Fax: +30-210-7464676; E-mail: eterpos{at}hotmail.com

Background: Bisphosphonates (BPs) prevent, reduce, and delay multiple myeloma (MM)-related skeletal complications. Intravenous pamidronate and zoledronic acid, and oral clodronate are used for the management of MM bone disease. The purpose of this paper is to review the current evidence for the use of BPs in MM and provide European Union-specific recommendations to support the clinical practice of treating myeloma bone disease.

Design and methods: An interdisciplinary, expert panel of specialists on MM and myeloma-related bone disease convened for a face-to-face meeting to review and assess the evidence and develop the recommendations. The panel reviewed and graded the evidence available from randomized clinical trials, clinical practice guidelines, and the body of published literature. Where published data were weak or unavailable, the panel used their own clinical experience to put forward recommendations based solely on their expert opinions.

Results: The panel recommends the use of BPs in MM patients suffering from lytic bone disease or severe osteoporosis. Intravenous administration may be preferable; however, oral administration can be considered for patients unable to make hospital visits. Dosing should follow approved indications with adjustments if necessary. In general, BPs are well tolerated, but preventive steps should be taken to avoid renal impairment and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). The panel agrees that BPs should be given for 2 years, but this may be extended if there is evidence of active myeloma bone disease. Initial therapy of ONJ should include discontinuation of BPs until healing occurs. BPs should be restarted if there is disease progression.

Conclusions: BPs are an essential component of MM therapy for minimizing skeletal morbidity. Recent retrospective data indicate that a modified dosing regimen and preventive measures can greatly reduce the incidence of ONJ.

Key words: bisphosphonates, multiple myeloma, osteonecrosis of the jaw, recommendations, renal impairment

Received for publication September 2, 2008. Revision received December 2, 2008. Accepted for publication December 19, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
H. Ludwig, M. Beksac, J. Blade, M. Boccadoro, J. Cavenagh, M. Cavo, M. Dimopoulos, J. Drach, H. Einsele, T. Facon, et al.
Current Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies with Novel Agents: A European Perspective
Oncologist, January 1, 2010; 15(1): 6 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.