Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on December 16, 2008
Annals of Oncology 2009 20(3):425-430; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn678
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/425    most recent
mdn678v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Italiano, A.
Right arrow Articles by Blay, J.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Italiano, A.
Right arrow Articles by Blay, J.-Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

sarcomas

Neo/adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve outcome in resected primary synovial sarcoma: a study of the French Sarcoma Group

A. Italiano1,{dagger},*, N. Penel2,3,{dagger}, Y.-M. Robin4, B. Bui1, A. Le Cesne5, S. Piperno-Neumann6, M. Tubiana-Hulin7, E. Bompas8, C. Chevreau9, N. Isambert10, S. Leyvraz11, P. P. du Chatelard12, A. Thyss13, J.-M. Coindre14 and J.-Y. Blay15,16

1 Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
2 Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
3 Equipe d'Accueil 2694: Santé Publique, Epidémiologie et modélisation des maladies chroniques, University of Lille II, Lille
4 Department of Pathology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
5 Department of Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
6 Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
7 Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud
8 Department of Medical Oncology, Centre René Gauducheau, Nantes
9 Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse
10 Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
11 Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Centre Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
12 Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Paul Papin, Angers
13 Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice
14 Department of Pathology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux
15 Departement of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon
16 Unité INSERM 590, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

* Correspondence to: Dr A. Italiano, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France. Tel: +33-05-56-33-33-33; Fax: +33-05-56-33-33-30; E-mail: italiano{at}bergonie.org

Background: There are only scarce data about the benefit of adjunctive chemotherapy in patients with localized synovial sarcoma (SS).

Patients and methods: Data from 237 SS patients recorded in the database of the French Sarcoma Group were retrospectively analyzed. The respective impact of radiotherapy, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) were assessed after adjustment to prognostic factors.

Results: The median follow-up was 58 months (range 1–321). Adjuvant, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy were administered in 112, 45 and 181 cases, respectively. In all, 59% of patients treated with chemotherapy received an ifosfamide-containing regimen. The 5-year OS, LRFS and DRFS rates were 64.0%, 70% and 57%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age >35 years old, grade 3 and not-R0 margins were highly significant independent predictors of worse OS. After adjustment to prognostic factors, radiotherapy significantly improved LRFS but not DRFS or OS. Neither neo-adjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy had significant impact on OS, LRFS or DRFS.

Conclusion: As for other high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas, well-planned wide surgical excision with adjuvant radiotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for SS. Neo-adjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy should not be delivered outside a clinical trial setting.

Key words: adjuvant chemotherapy, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapysynovial sarcoma


{dagger} These authors contributed equally to the work and must be considered as two first coauthors.

Received for publication July 29, 2008. Revision received September 13, 2008. Accepted for publication September 17, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.