Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on October 7, 2008
Annals of Oncology 2009 20(2):278-285; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn634
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/278    most recent
mdn634v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maniadakis, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fountzilas, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maniadakis, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fountzilas, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

breast cancer

Economic evaluation of taxane-based first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer in Greece: an analysis alongside a multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trial

N. Maniadakis1,*, U. Dafni2, V. Fragoulakis3, I. Grimani4, E. Galani5, A. Fragkoulidi6 and G. Fountzilas6

1 Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, Piraeus
2 Laboratory of Biostatistics, University of Athens School of Nursing
3 Administration Office, Social Insurance Institute
4 Data Office, Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
5 Second Department of Medical Oncology, Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens
6 Department of Medical Oncology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece

* Correspondence to: Prof. N. Maniadakis, Health Economics and Management, Department of Economics, University of Piraeus, Karaoli and Dimitriou 80 Street, 185 34 Piraeus, Greece. Tel: +302107244562; Fax: +302107227222; E-mail: nikos.maniadakis{at}psimitis.gr

Background: An economic evaluation was undertaken alongside a randomized phase III trial comparing three regimens for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Materials and methods: Trial resource utilization and unit price data were combined to evaluate the cost of chemotherapy, concomitant medications, hospitalizations, diagnostic and laboratory tests. Treatment cost was combined with survival to estimate the incremental cost per life year saved. Quality-of-life data were used to estimate cost per quality-adjusted life year saved. Sensitivity analysis was used to compute results for various subgroups and for discounting cost and effects.

Results: The combination of gemcitabine (Gemzar®, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, USA) with docetaxel (Taxotere®, Aventis Pharma, Dagenham, UK) (GDoc) is the least costly but least effective treatment. The combination of paclitaxel (Taxol) with carboplatin (Paraplatin®, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA) is associated with higher cost and effectiveness compared with GDoc, while weekly paclitaxel (Pw), associated with the highest cost, is the most effective option. The incremental cost per life year saved of Pw versus GDoc was 3660 Euros (95% uncertainty interval dominance—9261). This result remained fairly constant in sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions: The corresponding economic evaluation indicates that Pw represents an attractive treatment option for patients with MBC from an economic perspective in the context of the Greek National Health Service.

Key words: breast cancer, docetaxel, economic evaluation, gemcitabine, paclitaxel

Received for publication December 27, 2007. Revision received July 11, 2008. Accepted for publication August 18, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.