Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on July 17, 2008
Annals of Oncology 2008 19(12):2001-2006; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn421
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/12/2001    most recent
mdn421v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.
Right arrow Articles by Stebbing, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B.
Right arrow Articles by Stebbing, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

breast cancer

The clinical significance of radiologically detected silent pulmonary nodules in early breast cancer

B. Lee1, A. Lim2, A. Lalvani3, M. J. L. Descamps2, R. Leonard1, S. Nallamala1, J. S. Lewis4, R. C. Coombes1 and J. Stebbing1,*

1 Department of Medical Oncology
2 Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London
3 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, St Mary's Hospital, London
4 Department of Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK

* Correspondence to: Dr J Stebbing, Department of Medical Oncology, Imperial college, The Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, First Floor, E Wing, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK. Tel: +44-208-7468295; Fax: +44-208-8461433; E-mail: j.stebbing{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background: Increasing numbers of patients with early cancer undergo routine staging using computerized tomography (CT). Those in whom indeterminate pulmonary nodules are visualized without the presence of other metastatic lesions represent a clinical dilemma regarding their management as early breast cancer or metastatic disease.

Patients and methods: Medical records of breast cancer patients who underwent thoracic CT scans between the years 2002 and 2008 were analyzed. Those with obvious metastatic disease were excluded. Patients were identified via the radiology database by searching for the terms: ‘suspicious lung metastases’ and ‘indeterminate nodules’.

Results: Out of 1578 new patients assessed from 2002 to 2008, we carried out 802 staging CT scans. Thirty-four cases (4.2%) with indeterminate pulmonary nodules were identified. We categorized cases by size and number of nodules. At a median follow-up of 18 months, there were no changes in lesion size in 86% of patients with a solitary nodule <1 cm and 89% with multiple subcentimeter nodules. In contrast, in 100% of cases with pulmonary nodules >1 cm, the nodules had progressed at follow-up ({chi}2, P = 0.004).

Conclusions: Breast cancer cases with subcentimeter indeterminate pulmonary lesions and no evidence of metastases elsewhere are unlikely to represent metastatic disease. Treatment with curative intent or entry into clinical trials should not be excluded.

Key words: breast cancer, CT, indeterminate, lung nodule, suspicious

Received for publication May 28, 2008. Accepted for publication June 10, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.