Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2007 18(8):1359-1362; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm160
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carles, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carles, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 European Society for Medical Oncology

urogenital tumors

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination: a multicenter phase II trial in unfit patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer

J Carles1,*, E Esteban2, M Climent3, A Font4, JL Gonzalez-Larriba5, A Berrocal6, I Garcia-Ribas7, X Marfa8, X Fabregat1, J Albanell1, J Bellmunt1 On behalf of Spanish Oncology Genito Urinary Group Study Group

1 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona
2 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo
3 Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia
4 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona
5 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid
6 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario, Valencia to Hospital General Universitario, Valencia
7 Medical Department, Eli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas
8 Medical Department, Sanofi-Aventis, Barcelona, Spain

* Corresponding author: Dr J. Carles, Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Passeig Maritim, 25-29, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Tel: +34-93-248-31-37; Fax: +34-93-248-33-66; E-mail: jcarles{at}imas.imim.es

Background: Up to 50% of patients with bladder cancer cannot be treated with cisplatin because they are considered unfit due to poor renal function. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin are active, nonnephrotoxic therapies with nonoverlapping toxicity profiles that provide an alternative therapy for this group of patients.

Patients and methods: In a multicenter study, patients received gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days. Eligible criteria were creatinine clearance >30 ml/min and/or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of two or less.

Results: Forty-six patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Median age was 69 years (range 52–85), median ECOG two (range 0–2). Median number of metastatic sites was 2 (range 1–6). Median creatinine clearance was 50.73 ml/min (range 30–87). A total of 187 cycles were given with a median of 5 (range 1–6). Hematological toxicity was mild with grade 3–4 peripherical neuropathy occurring in 4% of patients. Overall response rate was 48% (three complete response, 19 partial response, seven stable disease and 17 progressive disease). Median time to disease progression was 5 months.

Conclusion: Gemcitabine–oxaliplatin is an active and tolerable combination with response rate that merits further study in patients with impaired renal function but good performance status.

Key words: bladder cancer, gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, unfit patients

Received for publication January 29, 2007. Revision received March 29, 2007. Accepted for publication March 29, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.