Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2007 18(3):576-580; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl440
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/3/576    most recent
mdl440v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Santini, D
Right arrow Articles by Tonini, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Santini, D
Right arrow Articles by Tonini, G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

phase I and pharmacokinetics

A phase I trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus capecitabine in metastatic cancer patients

D Santini*, V Virzí, B Vincenzi, L Rocci, V Leoni and G Tonini

Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy

* Correspondence to: Dr D. Santini, Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Via Emilio Longoni, 69, 00155 Rome, Italy. Tel: +39-06-22541737; Fax: +39-06-22541520; E-mail: d.santini{at}unicampus.it

Background: Capecitabine and gemcitabine given as fixed dose rate (FDR) has not been demonstrated to be well tolerated in phase I previous studies. The goals of this phase I study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of this combination and to describe the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLT) and the safety profile of this way of administration.

Patients and methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible for this study. Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 650 mg/m2 bis in die (b.i.d.) for 14 consecutive days. Gemcitabine was administered at FDR of 10 mg/m2 per min in escalating durations of infusion on days 1 and 8. The cycles were repeated every 21 days.

Results: All 20 patients enrolled into the study were assessable for toxicity. Only one out of the first six patients treated at FDR gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m2 met protocol-specified DLT criteria (grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥7 days) during the first two cycles. At these doses the majority of cycles of therapy were, however, delivered without dose reduction or delay. Another similar episode of DLT was observed at the same dose step among the following eight included patients. The dose of FDR gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 in 80 min on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 650 mg/m2 b.i.d., for 14 consecutive days followed by 1 week of rest is recommended for further study.

Conclusion: The combination of FDR gemcitabine plus capecitabine can be administered with acceptable toxicity. The evidence of antitumor activity deserves further investigation in phase II combination chemotherapy studies.

Key words: capecitabine, fixed dose rate, gemcitabine, phase I study

Received for publication September 7, 2006. Revision received October 24, 2006. Accepted for publication October 31, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E. M. Ciruelos, J. Cortes, H. Cortes-Funes, J. I. Mayordomo, B. Bermejo, B. Ojeda, E. Garcia, C. A. Rodriguez, M. Munoz, P. Gomez, et al.
Gemcitabine and capecitabine in previously anthracycline-treated metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study (SOLTI 0301 trial)
Ann. Onc., November 25, 2009; (2009) mdp536v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.