Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2006 17(Supplement 7):vii60-vii65; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl953
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gebbia, V.
Right arrow Articles by Tralongo, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gebbia, V.
Right arrow Articles by Tralongo, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

symposium article

Raltitrexed plus levofolinic acid and bolus/continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil on a biweekly schedule for elderly patients with advanced colorectal carcinomas

V. Gebbia1,*, F. Verderame2, F. Ferraù3, R. Bordonaro4, A. Callari5, M. Caruso6, M. L. Tirrito7, R. Valenza8, G. Cicero9, N. Borsellino10 and P. Tralongo11

Medical Oncology Units of the: 1 Department of Experimental Oncology and Clinical Applications, University of Palermo; 2 Ospedale Civile, Sciacca; 3 Ospedale San Vincenzo, Taormina; 4 Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele, Catania; 5 Casa di Cura Noto-Pasqualino, Palermo; 6 Centro Oncologico Catanese, Catania; 7 Casa di Cura Torina, Palermo; 8 Ospedale Vittorio Emanuele, Gela; 9 Ospedale di Castrovillari; 10 Ospedale Buccheri – La Ferla, Palermo; 11 Ospedale Di Maria, Avola, Italy

* Correspondence to: Dr V. Gebbia, Via Alessandro Paternostro 48, 90133 Palermo, Italy. Tel: +39-091-6806710; E-mail: vittorio.gebbia{at}tin.it

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the raltitrexed/5-fluorouracil/levofolinic acid combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer.

Patients and methods: Previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received raltitrexed 2 mg/m2 i.v. plus levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil according to the De Gramont' schedule given every 2 weeks as first-line chemotherapy. Patients were re-evaluated after six cycles and chemotherapy was continued up to tolerance or disease progression.

Results: Seventy patients aged ≥65 years were accrued from 11 centers between September 2001 and July 2002. According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 35% (95% CI 29.5% to 40.5%) including one complete response (1%) and 24 partial responses (34%). Twenty patients (31%) showed a stabilization of disease for a tumor growth control rate of 64% (95% CI 57% to 71%). The median overall survival was 12.5 months and the median time to disease progression was 6.5 months. No toxic deaths or allergic reaction were recorded. Grade 4 toxicities were non-existent. The main hematological toxicity was grade 3 neutropenia, which occurred in 9% of patients, and grade 3 anemia in only one case, while no case of graded 3 thrombocytopenia was observed. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were asthenia (11%), transient increase of transaminases (10%) and diarrhea (4%).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the raltitrexed/5-fluorouracil/levolofinic acid combination is an effective and well tolerated regimen for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Its ease of administration and patient's tolerance warrant further investigation over 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid regimens.

Key words: colorectal cancer, metastases, raltitrexed, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.