Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2006 17(Supplement 7):vii15-vii17; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl942
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorusso, V.
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorusso, V.
Right arrow Articles by Colucci, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

symposium article

Oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine (oral vincap) combination in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). A phase II study of the GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale)

V. Lorusso1,*, M. Spada2, M. Giampaglia2, A. Misino2, R. Calabrese2, A. Latorre2, G. Monticelli1, M. Guida2, D. Sambiasi2 and G. Colucci2

1 Medical Oncology Unit, ‘Vito Fazzi’ Hospital, Lecce; 2 Medical Oncology Department, Oncology Institute, Bari

* Correspondence to: Dr V. Lorusso, Medical Onncology Unit, Ospedale Vito Fazzi, Lecce. Tel: +39-080-5555257; Fax: +39-080-5555257; E-mail: vitolorusso{at}inwind.it

Background: Vinorelbine i.v. and capecitabine are two of the most effective single agents in previously treated advanced breast cancer (ABC). A number of studies have been reported with the combination of these agents. Actually, the availability of oral formulation for vinorelbine allows a full oral combination of the two agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this novel combination.

Patients and methods: Thirty-eight advanced breast cancer patients refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes were included in this study. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 (days 1 + 8), and capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 (days 2–7 and 9–16) every 3 weeks.

Results: A total of 228 courses were given with a mean of three cycles/patient (range 1–12). Five patients (13.1%) had no toxicity at all. Hematologic side-effects were: neutropenia grade 2–3 in seven patients (18.9%) and grade 4 in one patient (2.7%), anemia grade 1 in 11 patients (29.7%), grade 2–3 in five patients (13.5%), thrombocytopenia grade 1 in six patients (16.2%) and grade 3 in one patient (2.7%). Non-hematologic side-effects were: fatigue grade 1 in five patients (13.5%), hand–foot syndrome grade 1 in two patients (5.4%) and grade 2 in two patients (5.4%), nausea/vomiting grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), grade 2 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 3 in one patient (2.7%), constipation grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), peripheral neurotoxicity grade 1 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 2 in one patient (2.7%), gastric pain grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), stomatitis grade 1 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 2 in one patient (2.7%). Out of 38 patients assessable, we observed two (5.4%) CR, 13 (34 %) PR, 14 (37.8%) SD and nine (26.3%) PD. The median time to progression was 4.5 months (range 1–18 months), the median response duration was 7 months (range 2–18 months) and the median survival duration was 10 months (range 2–26+).

Conclusions: The oral vincap should be considered as an alternative to single agent capecitabine or vinorelbine in ABC refractory to antra-taxane combination.

Key words: capecitabine, vinorelbine, breast cancer, oral chemotherapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Findlay, G. von Minckwitz, and A. Wardley
Effective oral chemotherapy for breast cancer: pillars of strength
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2008; 19(2): 212 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.