Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2006 17(Supplement 5):v118-v122; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj965
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Arning, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Arning, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

symposium article

Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer

J. T. Roberts3,*, H. von der Maase2, L. Sengeløv3, P. F. Conte4, L. Dogliotti5, T. Oliver6, M. J. Moore7, A. Zimmermann8 and M. Arning8

1 Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; 2 Department of Oncology, Herlev University Hospital, Denmark; 3 Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment, Newcastle General Hospital, UK; 4 Santa Chiara Hospital, Italy; 5 University of Torino, St. Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy; 6 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, UK; 7 The Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada; 8 Eli Lilly and Company, IN, USA

* Correspondence to: Dr J. T. Roberts, Northern Centre for Cancer Treatment, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 6BE UK. Tel: +44 191 256 3543; E-mail: trevor.roberts{at}nuth.nhs.uk

Purpose: To compare long-term survival in patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC).

Patients and methods: Efficacy data from a large randomized phase III study of GC versus MVAC were updated. Time-to-event analyses were performed on the observed distributions of overall survival time and progression-free survival.

Results: Four hundred and five patients were randomized, 203 to the GC arm and 202 to the MVAC arm. At the time of this analysis, 347 patients have died (GC 176, MVAC 171). Overall survival was similar in both arms (HR 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.34, P = 0.66) with a median survival of 14.0 months (95% CI 12.3–15.5 months) in the GC, and 15.2 months (95% CI 13.2–17.3 months) in the MVAC arm. The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months with GC (95% CI 6.8–8.8) and 8.3 months with MVAC (95% CI 7.3–9.7) with a HR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.89–1.34). Significant prognostic factors favoring overall survival included performance status (>70), TNM staging (M0 vs. M1), low/normal alkaline phosphatase expression, number of sites of disease <3, and the absence of visceral metastasis. By adjusting for these prognostic factors, the HR was 0.99 for overall survival and 1.01 for progression-free survival.

Conclusions: Long-term overall and progression-free survival following treatment with GC or MVAC are similar. These results strengthen the role of GC as a standard of care in patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC).

Key words: gemcitabine, cisplatin, bladder cancer, survival


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. P. Abernethy, G. Raman, E. M. Balk, J. M. Hammond, L. A. Orlando, J. L. Wheeler, J. Lau, and D. C. McCrory
Systematic Review: Reliability of Compendia Methods for Off-Label Oncology Indications
Ann Intern Med, March 3, 2009; 150(5): 336 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.