Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2006 17(Supplement 4):iv33-iv36; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj997
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lokiec, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lokiec, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

symposium article

Ifosfamide: pharmacokinetic properties for central nervous system metastasis prevention

F. Lokiec

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, René Huguenin Cancer Center, Saint-Cloud, France

Correspondence to: Dr F. Lokiec, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, René Huguenin Cancer Center, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France. Tel: +33-147111615; Fax: +33-147111617; E-mail: lokiec{at}crh1.org

The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) recurrence in patients with lymphoma is about 5%. Nevertheless, this complication is very serious because it is almost always fatal. Its incidence is not sufficiently high to warrant the use of CNS prophylaxis in all patients. The identification of subgroups for whom CNS prophylaxis may be of benefit is therefore important and the age-adjusted international prognostic index (aa-IPI) may be useful in this respect. Ifosfamide (IFO) is a widely used antitumor agent, requiring activation to isophosphoramide mustard (IPM) for DNA alkylation. IFO anabolism occurs through the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 system. As with the majority of antineoplastic agents, IFO has toxic side-effects. These include neurotoxicity due to the chloroacetaldehyde (CAA) catabolite. However, the incidence of neurotoxicity is low when IFO is administered as a continuous intravenous infusion. Both inactive IFO and active IPM cross the blood–brain barrier, making IFO treatment effective in the prevention of CNS metastasis in lymphoma patients at high risk of recurrence. The benefit/risk ratio for such patients should evaluated.

Key words: central nervous system, ifosfamide, lymphoma, neurotoxicity, prevention of cerebral metastasis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The OncologistHome page
M. Tascilar, W. J. Loos, C. Seynaeve, J. Verweij, and S. Sleijfer
The Pharmacologic Basis of Ifosfamide Use in Adult Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas
Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1351 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.