Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on January 10, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2006 17(7):1039-1050; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj125
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
review |
Occupational silica exposure and lung cancer risk: a review of epidemiological studies 19962005
1 Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milano; 2 Dipartimento di Traumatologia, Ortopedia e Medicina del Lavoro, Università degli Studi di Torino, via Zuretti 29, 10126 Torino; 3 Department of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Cagliari, via S. Giorgio 12, 09124 Cagliari, Italy; 4 Istituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy
* Correspondence to: Dr C. Pelucchi, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via Eritrea, 62, 20157 Milano, Italy. Tel: +39 0239014577; Fax: +39 0233200231; E-mail: pelucchi{at}marionegri.it
Background: In 1997, a Monograph from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified occupational exposure to crystalline silica as carcinogenic to humans. Large amounts of epidemiological data have been published subsequently.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of epidemiological investigations on silica exposure and lung cancer risk published after the IARC Monograph, including 28 cohort, 15 casecontrol and two proportionate mortality ratio (PMR) studies. These were identified in the available literature.
Results: The pooled RR of lung cancer, calculated using random effects models, from all cohort studies considering occupational exposure to silica was 1.34. The RRs were 1.69 in cohort studies of silicotics only, 1.25 in studies where silicosis status was undefined and 1.19 among non silicotic subjects. The pooled RR was 1.41 for all casecontrol studies. The RRs were 3.27 in casecontrol studies of silicotics only, 1.41 in studies where silicosis status was undefined and 0.97 among non silicotic subjects. The RR was 1.24 for PMR studies.
Conclusions. In this re-analysis, the association with lung cancer was consistent for silicotics, but the data were limited for non silicotic subjects and not easily explained for undefined silicosis status workers. This leaves open the issue of doserisk relation and pathogenic mechanisms and supports the conclusion that the carcinogenic role of silica per se in absence of silicosis is still unclear.
Key words: casecontrol studies, cohort studies, lung neoplasms, silica, silicosis, systematic review
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Yu, L. Tse, C. Leung, T. Wong, C. Tam, and A. Chan Lung cancer mortality among silicotic workers in Hong Kong--no evidence for a link Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1056 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
