Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on March 8, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2006 17(6):1000-1006; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl019
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment
1 Martin Luther University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany; 2 IMO Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland; 3 Instituto de Oncologia Hematologia, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela; 4 Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea; 5 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 6 Asklepios Fachkliniken, Centre for Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, Gauting, Germany; 7 Merck Research Laboratories, Brussels, Belgium; 8 Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA; 9 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA
* Correspondence to: Prof. H. J. Schmoll, Martin-Luther-University Halle/Wittenberg, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ernst-Grube-Str.40, 06120 Halle/Saale, Germany. Tel: +49-345/557-2924; Fax: +49-345/557-2950; E-mail: hans-joachim.schmoll{at}medizin.uni-halle.de
Background: We compared an aprepitant regimen with a control regimen of ondansetron + dexamethasone given for 4 days.
Patients and methods: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin
70 mg/m2 were randomized to either the aprepitant regimen (aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 23; dexamethasone on day 4) or control regimen (ondansetron + dexamethasone on days 14). Patients recorded vomiting, nausea and rescue therapy use. The primary end point was complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) in the overall phase (days 15 post-cisplatin).
Results: Complete response rates were higher in the aprepitant than control group in the overall (72% versus 61%; P = 0.003), acute (day 1; 88% versus 79%; P = 0.005) and delayed phases (days 25; 74% versus 63%; P = 0.004), as were rates of no vomiting (overall 77% versus 62%, P
0.001; acute 89% versus 81%, P = 0.004; delayed 79% versus 64%, P
0.001). Rates of no rescue therapy were similar between groups.
Conclusions: Compared with an antiemetic regimen in which ondansetron + dexamethasone were given for 4 days, the aprepitant regimen was superior in the acute, delayed and overall phases of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The aprepitant regimen should be considered a new standard of antiemetic therapy for cisplatin-treated patients. www.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NTC00090207
Key words: aprepitant, chemotherapy, cisplatin, dexamethasone, emesis, ondansetron
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Roila, J. Rolski, R. Ramlau, M. Dediu, M. W. Russo, R. R. Bandekar, and S. M. Grunberg Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial of the oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1867 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gralla and H. Raftopoulos Progress in the Control of Chemotherapy-Induced Emesis: New Agents and New Studies J. Oncol. Pract, May 1, 2009; 5(3): 130 - 133. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Naeim, S. M. Dy, K. A. Lorenz, H. Sanati, A. Walling, and S. M. Asch Evidence-Based Recommendations for Cancer Nausea and Vomiting J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2008; 26(23): 3903 - 3910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Hesketh Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting N. Engl. J. Med., June 5, 2008; 358(23): 2482 - 2494. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Jordan, C. Sippel, and H.-J. Schmoll Guidelines for Antiemetic Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Past, Present, and Future Recommendations Oncologist, September 1, 2007; 12(9): 1143 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




