Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on June 21, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2006 17(10):1560-1567; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl151
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/10/1560    most recent
mdl151v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fountzilas, G
Right arrow Articles by Daniilidis, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fountzilas, G
Right arrow Articles by Daniilidis, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

head and neck cancer

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine vs. paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in advanced non–nasopharyngeal head and neck cancer. An efficacy and cost analysis randomized study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

G Fountzilas1, P Papakostas2, U Dafni3, T Makatsoris4, M Karina1, A Kalogera-Fountzila1, N Maniadakis5, G Aravantinos6, K Syrigos7, A Bamias8, C Christodoulou9, T Economopoulos10, HP Kalofonos4, A Nikolaou1, N Angouridakis1, G Stathopoulos9, D Bafaloukos11, N Pavlidis12 and J Daniilidis1

1 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki
2 ‘Ippokration’ Hospital
3 Laboratory of Biostatistics, University of Athens School of Nursing, Athens
4 University of Patras School of Medicine, Patras
5 University Hospital, Iraklio
6 ‘Agii Anargiri’ Cancer Hospital
7 Oncology Unit, 3rd Department of Medicine, Athens Medical School
8 Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens School of Medicine
9 ‘Henry Dunant’ Hospital
10 University Hospital ‘Attikon’
11 ‘Metropolitan’ Hospital, Athens
12 University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina; Greece

Correspondence to: Prof G. Fountzilas, Department of Medical Oncology, ‘Papageorgiou’ Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece. E-mail: fountzil{at}med.auth.gr

Background: The prognosis of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) is poor. Median survival of these patients following chemotherapy is in the range of 6 to 9 months. In the present randomized phase III trial we compared two new combinations containing new drugs with proven activity in phase II studies with patients with HNC.

Patients and methods: From November 1999 until November 2004, 166 eligible patients with HNC were enrolled in the study. They were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (group A, 85 patients) or with paclitaxel, as in group A, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks (group B, 81 patients).

Results: There was no significant difference in response rate (20% versus 29%, P = 0.21), time to disease progression (median; 4.4 months versus 6.0 months, P = 0.09) and survival (median; 8.6 months versus 11.05 months, P = 0.25). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported side effect, apart from alopecia, was neutropenia. Overall, there was no significant difference in severe toxicity between the two treatment arms.

Conclusions: The present study could not demonstrate a survival benefit with either regimen. Both treatments were well tolerated. Randomized studies comparing each of the two regimens with standard chemotherapy are warranted.

Key words: paclitaxel, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, chemotherapy, head and neck cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
N. Maniadakis, U. Dafni, V. Fragoulakis, I. Grimani, E. Galani, A. Fragkoulidi, and G. Fountzilas
Economic evaluation of taxane-based first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer in Greece: an analysis alongside a multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trial
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2009; 20(2): 278 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.