Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on July 27, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2006 17(10):1533-1538; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl154
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/10/1533    most recent
mdl154v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von der Maase, H
Right arrow Articles by Kania, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von der Maase, H
Right arrow Articles by Kania, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

urogenital tumors

A phase II trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in locally advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

H von der Maase1,*, J Lehmann2, G Gravis3, H Joensuu4, PF Geertsen5, J Gough6, G Chen6 and M Kania6

1 Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
2 Klinik für Urologie and Kinderurologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany
3 Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
4 Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland
5 Department of Oncology, Herlev University Hospital, Denmark
6 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

*Correspondence to: Prof H. von der Maase, Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Tel: +45-89-49-25-31; Fax: +45-89-49-25-30; E-mail: maase{at}as.aaa.dk

Background: Both pemetrexed and gemcitabine have single-agent activity in bladder cancer, but the combination of these two drugs has not been previously evaluated for safety and efficacy in this disease. Thus, the objectives in the current study were to determine overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, overall survival and safety and toxicity in chemonaive patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium.

Patients and methods: Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 was administered over 30 min i.v. on days 1 and 8, and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 over 10 min i.v. on day 8 after gemcitabine, every 21 days.

Results: Sixty-four patients were enrolled, 11 female and 53 male, median age 65 years (range 38–81), median WHO performance status of 1. Visceral metastases were present in 55% of patients. ORR among 47 patients evaluable for response was 28% (95% CI 16% to 43%) and ORR for the intention-to-treat population was 20% (95% CI 11% to 32%) with three CR and 10 PR. Median response duration was 11.2 months and median overall survival 10.3 months (95% CI 8.1–14.6 months). CTC grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included anemia (19%), thrombocytopenia (9%), neutropenia (38%), febrile neutropenia (17%) and neutropenic sepsis (3%). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included elevated transaminases (12%), dyspnea (8%), fatigue (8%) and stomatitis (5%). There was one toxic death due to neutropenic sepsis.

Conclusions: The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine had a manageable safety profile. However, efficacy was apparently not superior to that of single-agent gemcitabine.

Key words: bladder cancer, gemcitabine, pemetrexed, urothelial cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Bellmunt, C. Theodore, T. Demkov, B. Komyakov, L. Sengelov, G. Daugaard, A. Caty, J. Carles, A. Jagiello-Gruszfeld, O. Karyakin, et al.
Phase III Trial of Vinflunine Plus Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone After a Platinum-Containing Regimen in Patients With Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelial Tract
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2009; 27(27): 4454 - 4461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyHome page
G. Sonpavde, A. A. Elfiky, and J. E. Rosenberg
Review: Novel agents for advanced bladder cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, July 1, 2009; 1(1): 37 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
C. Sweeney, D. F. Bajorin, and C. N. Sternberg
Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: What Have We Learned and What's New on the Horizon?
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 200 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G Di Lorenzo and S De Placido
Re: Perabo FGE and Muller SC. New agents for treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 835-843.
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1118 - 1118.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.