© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology
Articles |
Current clinical outcomes demand new treatment options for SCCHN
Département de Cancérologie Cervico-Faciale, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
* Correspondence to: Dr J.-L. Lefebvre, Département de Cancérologie Cervico-Faciale, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, B.P. 307, F-59020, Lille, France. Tel: +33 3 2029 5531; Fax: +33 3 2029 5961; E-mail: jl-lefebvre{at}o-lambret.fr
Head and neck cancer can be a devastating disease. The mainstays of treatment for early stage disease are either radiotherapy or surgery. However, although disease responds well at this stage, the risk of a second primary cancer is high, with a development rate of about 4% per year. Advanced diseases are treated either by surgery with postoperative radiotherapy or by definitive radiotherapy, with surgery in reserve for salvage if necessary. Over the past two decades major advances have been made in surgery (reconstructive surgery, non-mutilating surgery). Either definitive or postoperative, radiotherapy is an integral part of the treatment for the majority of non-metastatic stages of disease and ways of improving the effects of radiotherapy are constantly being explored. Good activity has been reported for the use of altered radiation fractionation regimens, which allow the delivery of intensified radiation doses. In addition, in recent years randomized trials and meta-analyses have confirmed the survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in a number of different settings. Cisplatin-based regimens have been identified as the most active and are now standard treatment choices. The survival benefits of chemotherapy appear to be limited to concomitant administration and do not extend to neoadjuvant administration, although this has demonstrated clinical utility in preserving organ function. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is by many clinicians considered the standard approach to the treatment of recurrent/metastatic disease for patients who are able to tolerate such regimens, but the prognosis for these patients remains poor; this is particularly true for those whose disease progresses on such therapy. This paper discusses current approaches and recent advances in the treatment of head and neck cancer, specifically squamous cell carcinoma, and suggests future management aims for the different disease stages.
Key words: chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, head and neck cancer, locally advanced, radiotherapy, recurrent/metastatic
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. R. Seethala, W. E. Gooding, P. N. Handler, B. Collins, Q. Zhang, J. M. Siegfried, and J. R. Grandis Immunohistochemical Analysis of Phosphotyrosine Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Autocrine Signaling Pathways in Head and Neck Cancers and Metastatic Lymph Nodes Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 14(5): 1303 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. Vermorken, E. Remenar, C. van Herpen, T. Gorlia, R. Mesia, M. Degardin, J. S. Stewart, S. Jelic, J. Betka, J. H. Preiss, et al. Cisplatin, Fluorouracil, and Docetaxel in Unresectable Head and Neck Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., October 25, 2007; 357(17): 1695 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Skvortsov, I. Skvortsova, T. Stasyk, N. Schiefermeier, A. Neher, A. R. Gunkel, G. K. Bonn, L. A. Huber, P. Lukas, C. M. Pleiman, et al. Antitumor activity of CTFB, a novel anticancer agent, is associated with the down-regulation of nuclear factor-{kappa}B expression and proteasome activation in head and neck squamous carcinoma cell lines Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2007; 6(6): 1898 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|