Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on April 28, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(7):1069-1075; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi216
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology
Randomized phase III trial comparing cisplatinetoposide to carboplatinpaclitaxel in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
1 University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; 2 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; 3 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; 4 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; 5 Oncology/Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH; 6 Carle Cancer Center, Urbana, IL; 7 Michiana Hematology/Oncology, South Bend, IN; 8 Mt. Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; 9 Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
* Correspondence to: Prof. C. P. Belani, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, 150 Centre Avenue, Suite 570, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA. Tel: +1 412 648 6619; Fax +1 412 648 6579; Email: belanicp{at}upmc.edu
Background:: The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the regimen of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (investigational arm) versus the reference regimen of cisplatin plus etoposide for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
Patients and methods:: A total of 369 patients were enrolled, 179 on arm A (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2) and 190 on arm B (carboplatin AUC=6 mg/ml min and paclitaxel 225 mg/m2), with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. The arms were well balanced with respect to age, performance status, weight loss, stage of disease and disease measurability. However, significantly more women were randomized to arm A than to arm B (P=0.039).
Results:: The objective response rate (ORR) was 15% on arm A compared with 23% on arm B (P=0.061). Median survival time, time to progression and 1-year survival rates for arms A and B were 274 days and 233 days (P=0.086), 111 days and 121 days (P=0.877), and 37% and 32%, respectively. The most prevalent toxicities were neutropenia and leukopenia and they occurred at a higher rate in arm A than in arm B.
Conclusion:: There was no statistically significant survival advantage for carboplatinpaclitaxel compared with cisplatinetoposide. However, there was an overall benefit in quality of life with the carboplatinpaclitaxel regimen.
Key words: carboplatin, cisplatin, combination therapy, etoposide, non-small-cell lung cancer, paclitaxel
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Naoki, H. Kunikane, T. Fujii, S. Tsujimura, N. Hida, H. Okamoto, and K. Watanabe Dose-escalating and Pharmacokinetic Study of a Weekly Combination of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Inoperable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: JCOG 9910-DI Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2009; (2009) hyp059v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Steger, T. Walles, B. Kosan, T. Walker, T. Kyriss, S. Veit, J. Dippon, and G. Friedel Trimodal Therapy for Histologically Proven N2/3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Mid-Term Results and Indicators for Survival. Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1676 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Belani, S. Ramalingam, M. C. Perry, R. V. LaRocca, D. Rinaldi, P. S. Gable, and W. J. Tester Randomized, Phase III Study of Weekly Paclitaxel in Combination With Carboplatin Versus Standard Every-3-Weeks Administration of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2008; 26(3): 468 - 473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ramalingam and C. Belani Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Directions Oncologist, January 1, 2008; 13(suppl_1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Simon, A. Sharma, X. Li, T. Hazelton, F. Walsh, C. Williams, A. Chiappori, E. Haura, T. Tanvetyanon, S. Antonia, et al. Feasibility and Efficacy of Molecular Analysis-Directed Individualized Therapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 25(19): 2741 - 2746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yokomise, M. Gotoh, T. Okamoto, Y. Yamamoto, S. Ishikawa, T. Nakashima, D. Masuya, D. Liu, and C.-l. Huang Induction chemoradiotherapy (carboplatin-taxane and concurrent 50-Gy radiation) for bulky cN2, N3 non small cell lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2007; 133(5): 1179 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y Ohe, Y Ohashi, K Kubota, T Tamura, K Nakagawa, S Negoro, Y Nishiwaki, N Saijo, Y Ariyoshi, M Fukuoka, et al. Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Four-Arm Cooperative Study in Japan Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 317 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Booton, P. Lorigan, H. Anderson, S. Baka, L. Ashcroft, M. Nicolson, M. O'Brien, D. Dunlop, K. O'Byrne, V. Laurence, et al. A phase III trial of docetaxel/carboplatin versus mitomycin C/ifosfamide/cisplatin (MIC) or mitomycin C/vinblastine/cisplatin (MVP) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial of the British Thoracic Oncology Group (BTOG1) Ann. Onc., July 1, 2006; 17(7): 1111 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Besse, J. C. Soria, and T. Le Chevalier Front-line doublets in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: The golden age for second line chemotherapy Ann. Onc., July 1, 2005; 16(7): 997 - 998. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





