Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on June 6, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(7):1005-1053; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi211
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology
Review |
Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature
1 Medical Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology and Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2 Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia; 3 School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia; 4 Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; 5 Department of Medical Oncology, Hamilton Health Sciences, Juravinski Cancer Center, Ontario, Canada
* Correspondence to: Prof. P. Butow, Medical Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, Griffith Taylor Building (A19), University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Tel: +61-2-9351-2859; Fax: +61-2-9036-5292; Email: phyllisb{at}psych.usyd.edu.au
Prognosis is an issue that most doctors and patients describe as difficult to discuss and the best way of presenting prognostic information to optimise patient understanding, psychological adjustment and decision-making is uncertain. A systematic review of the literature was conducted with the aim of clarifying the current available knowledge of patient preferences, clinician views and current practice regarding the communication of prognosis. Eleven primary research questions guided organisation of the review findings, which were: patient preferences for prognostic information and preferred style of communicating prognosis; disclosure of prognosis to family members; physicians' views on communication of prognosis; current practice of delivering prognostic information; patient understanding and awareness of prognostic information; cultural differences in preferences and understanding; impact of prognostic information on patient outcomes; and interventions to facilitate prognostic discussion. Predictors of patient preferences for and understanding of prognostic information were also summarised. Studies are summarised under the subcategories according to the participants' disease stage. It was found that the majority of the published research has been conducted in the early stage cancer setting providing mostly descriptive evidence, and there is little evidence of the best method of communicating prognosis or of the impact of prognostic information on patient outcomes.
Key words: communication, prognosis, review
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Audrey, J. Abel, J. M Blazeby, S. Falk, and R. Campbell What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: qualitative study BMJ, July 31, 2008; 337(jul31_3): a752 - a752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Gabrijel, L. Grize, E. Helfenstein, M. Brutsche, P. Grossman, M. Tamm, and A. Kiss Receiving the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: Patient Recall of Information and Satisfaction With Physician Communication J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2008; 26(2): 297 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Hancock, J. M Clayton, S. M Parker, S. Wal der, P. N Butow, S. Carrick, D. Currow, D. Ghersi, P. Glare, R. Hagerty, et al. Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2007; 21(6): 507 - 517. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. T. Penson, F. Gu, S. Harris, M. M. Thiel, N. Lawton, A. F. Fuller Jr., and T. J. Lynch Jr. Hope Oncologist, September 1, 2007; 12(9): 1105 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Cartwright, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, G. Williams, K. Faisst, F. Mortier, T. Nilstun, M. Norup, A. van der Heide, and G. Miccinesi Physician discussions with terminally ill patients: a cross-national comparison Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2007; 21(4): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. K Sokol Can deceiving patients be morally acceptable? BMJ, May 12, 2007; 334(7601): 984 - 986. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. L. Back and R. M. Arnold Discussing Prognosis: "How Much Do You Want to Know?" Talking to Patients Who Are Prepared for Explicit Information J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2006; 24(25): 4209 - 4213. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Costantini, G. Morasso, M. Montella, P. Borgia, R. Cecioni, M. Beccaro, E. Sguazzotti, P. Bruzzi, and On behalf of the ISDOC Study Group Diagnosis and prognosis disclosure among cancer patients. Results from an Italian mortality follow-back survey Ann. Onc., May 1, 2006; 17(5): 853 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Bruera Process and Content of Decision Making by Advanced Cancer Patients J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2006; 24(7): 1029 - 1030. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Thorne, T. G. Hislop, M. Kuo, and E.-A. Armstrong Hope and Probability: Patient Perspectives of the Meaning of Numerical Information in Cancer Communication Qual Health Res, March 1, 2006; 16(3): 318 - 336. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|