Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on January 14, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(3):403-410; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/3/403    most recent
mdi083v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fauvet, R.
Right arrow Articles by Daraï, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fauvet, R.
Right arrow Articles by Daraï, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study

R. Fauvet, J. Boccara, C. Dufournet, C. Poncelet and E. Daraï*

Service de Gynécologie, Hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Paris, France

* Correspondence to: Professor E. Daraï, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75 020 Paris, France. Tel: +33-1-56-73-18; Fax: +33-1-56-01-73-17; Email: emile.darai{at}tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr

Background: Laparoscopy in the management of women with borderline ovarian tumors remains controversial. We therefore evaluated the adequacy of initial laparoscopic staging according to FIGO guidelines, by comparison with laparotomy.

Patients and methods: In a French retrospective multicenter study of 358 women with borderline ovarian tumors, we compared epidemiological characteristics, sonographic findings, serum tumor marker levels, and surgical and histological parameters between women undergoing laparoscopy and women undergoing laparotomy.

Results: One hundred and forty-nine (41.6%) of the 358 women underwent laparoscopy. Mean age, mean gestity and parity, and mean tumor size were higher in the laparotomy group. Forty-two women (28.2%) underwent laparoconversion, mainly for suspected ovarian cancer or large tumor volume. Conservative treatment and cyst rupture were more frequent in the laparoscopy group than in the laparoconversion and laparotomy groups (P <0.0001). The rate of complete staging was lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparoconversion and laparotomy groups (P <0.0001), with no difference between these latter two groups. No difference in the recurrence rate was noted between the groups, but a higher recurrence rate was observed after conservative treatment (P <0.001).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors is associated with a higher rate of cyst rupture and incomplete staging. Recurrence was more frequent after conservative treatment. Whatever the surgical route, the rate of complete initial staging was low, emphasizing the need to respect treatment guidelines for borderline ovarian tumors.

Key words: borderline ovarian tumor, laparoconversion, laparoscopy, laparotomy, recurrence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
I. Cadron, K. Leunen, T. Van Gorp, F. Amant, P. Neven, and I. Vergote
Management of Borderline Ovarian Neoplasms
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2928 - 2937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.