Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2005 16(2):322-329; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorenzo Bermejo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorenzo Bermejo, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hemminki, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original article

A population-based assessment of the clustering of breast cancer in families eligible for testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

J. Lorenzo Bermejo1,* and K. Hemminki1,2

1 Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; 2 Department of Biosciences at Novum, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden

* Correspondence to: Dr J. Lorenzo Bermejo, Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Tel: +49-6221-421805; Fax: +49-6221-421810; Email: j.lorenzo{at}dkfz.de

Background: The prevalence of families eligible for BRCA1/2 mutation testing in the population burden of breast cancer was analysed and the aggregation of breast cancer in these families was explored.

Patients and methods: The families of the Swedish Family-Cancer Database with at least three generations (N=944 723) were classified according to the criteria proposed by the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for BRCA1/2 mutation testing. We calculated the proportion of women with breast cancer in the classified families and used standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) to estimate the risk of histology specific breast cancers in families with suspected BRCA1/2 mutations.

Results: Families with two breast cancers before the age of 50 years included 1.8% of the breast cancer patients; 1% of the women with breast cancer belonged to families with breast and ovarian cancers. The SIR of female breast cancer was lowest in families with male breast cancer and highest in families with two women affected by breast cancer under the age of 50 years. The SIRs of medullary breast cancer agreed with the BRCA1 mutation prevalences detected by the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Conclusions: Most of the breast malignancies in families with male breast cancer are likely to be related to BRCA2 mutations. Non-BRCA1/2 related effects are probably involved in the strong clustering of breast cancer in families with early onset breast and ovarian cancers.

Key words: BRCA1, BRCA2, clinical criteria, mutation testing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Hemminki, J. Sundquist, and J. Lorenzo Bermejo
Familial Risks for Cancer as the Basis for Evidence-Based Clinical Referral and Counseling
Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Wilkening, J. L. Bermejo, B. Burwinkel, R. Klaes, C. R. Bartram, A. Meindl, P. Bugert, R. K. Schmutzler, B. Wappenschmidt, M. Untch, et al.
The Single Nucleotide Polymorphism IVS1+309 in Mouse Double Minute 2 Does Not Affect Risk of Familial Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 646 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.