Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2005 16(2):300-306; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi055
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsaros, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bumma, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katsaros, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bumma, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original article

Clinical and pharmacokinetic phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian carcinoma

D. Katsaros1,*, M. V. Oletti2, I. A. Rigault de la Longrais1, A. Ferrero3, A. Celano2, S. Fracchioli1, M. Donadio4, R. Passera5, L. Cattel5 and C. Bumma2

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, and 5 Department of Science and Drug Technology, University of Turin, Turin; 2 Department of Oncology, San Giovanni Antica Sede Hospital, Turin; 3 Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Mauriziano Hospital, University of Turin, Turin; 4 Department of Medical Oncology, COES, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Turin, Italy

* Correspondence to: Dr D. Katsaros, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, University of Turin, Via Ventimiglia 3, 10126 Turin, Italy. Tel: +39-011-3134459; Fax: +39-011-3134859; Email: dhocc{at}libero.it

Background: This multicenter phase II study evaluated feasibility, clinical efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and vinorelbine (VNR) in patients with platinum–paclitaxel pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

Patients and methods: All patients received prior treatment with platinum and paclitaxel. Thirty-two heavily pretreated (median number of chemotherapy regimens two, range one to six) ovarian cancer patients received treatment with PLD 30 mg/m2 and VNR 30 mg/m2 every three weeks for six cycles. Ten patients entered the pharmacokinetic study, five receiving the PLD–VNR and five the VNR–PLD sequence.

Results: In 30 patients evaluated for response and toxicity, the overall response rate was 37% and 10% of patients achieved stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.5 months (range 1–10) and 9 months (range 2–16), respectively. Toxicity was generally mild and reversible. VNR AUCtot and plasma levels were considerably higher in the PLD–VNR sequence.

Conclusions: The PLD–VNR regimen exhibits significant activity in heavily pretreated patients, is well tolerated and is associated with encouraging survival. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest the PLD–VNR sequence for further clinical applications. This regimen should be considered as a treatment option in patients with chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer.

Key words: ovarian cancer, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, pharmacokinetics, relapse, survival, vinorelbine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Sehouli, G. Oskay-Ozcelik, J. Kuhne, D. Stengel, H.-J. Hindenburg, P. Klare, G. Heinrich, B. Schmalfeldt, H. Mertens, O. Camara, et al.
Biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer: results of a multicenter phase-II trial
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 957 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.