Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2005 16(2):267-272; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleator, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleator, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Powles, T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original article

Good clinical response of breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy is associated with improved overall survival

S. J. Cleator1,*, A. Makris2, S. E. Ashley3, R. Lal4 and T. J. Powles5

1 Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, London; 2 Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex; 3 Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey; 4 Lincolns Inn Fields Laboratories, London; 5 Parkside Hospital, London, UK

* Correspondence to: Dr S. Cleator, The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK. Tel: +44-20-7970-6058; Fax: +44-20-7878-3858; Email: scleator{at}icr.ac.uk

Background: We present extended follow-up from a prospective randomised trial evaluating the role of neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer.

Patients and methods: 309 women were randomised to primary surgery followed by eight cycles of adjuvant mitoxantrone, methotrexate with tamoxifen (2MT) or 2MT with mitomycin-C (3MT) versus the same regimen for four cycles before followed by four cycles after surgery. For this analysis the median follow-up of patients was 112 months.

Results: After 10 years follow-up there is still no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) (71% versus 71%) or overall survival (OS) (63% versus 70%) when comparing adjuvant versus neoadjuvant treatment, respectively. Of 144 evaluable patients in the neoadjuvant arm, 74 achieved a good clinical response and 70 patients achieved a poor clinical response. Good responders had a superior DFS (80% versus 64%, P=0.01) and OS (77% versus 63%, P=0.03) compared to poor responders.

Conclusions: At 10 years, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment continue to have equivalent OS and DFS. Good clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with superior DFS and OS. This supports the use of clinical response of primary breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy as a surrogate marker of survival benefit.

Key words: breast cancer, chemotherapy, neoadjuvant, response, survival


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J.-Y. Pierga, F.-C. Bidard, C. Mathiot, E. Brain, S. Delaloge, S. Giachetti, P. de Cremoux, R. Salmon, A. Vincent-Salomon, and M. Marty
Circulating Tumor Cell Detection Predicts Early Metastatic Relapse After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Large Operable and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in a Phase II Randomized Trial
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 7004 - 7010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M.-L. W. Ah-See, A. Makris, N. J. Taylor, M. Harrison, P. I. Richman, R. J. Burcombe, J. J. Stirling, J. A. d'Arcy, D. J. Collins, M. R. Pittam, et al.
Early Changes in Functional Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict for Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 14(20): 6580 - 6589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J S Reis-Filho, C Westbury, and J-Y Pierga
The impact of expression profiling on prognostic and predictive testing in breast cancer.
J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 59(3): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Bogaerts, R. Sylvester, and P. Therasse
Analysis of breast cancer survival by clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2006; 17(2): 352 - 353.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.