Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2005 16(2):263-266; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puglisi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Piga, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puglisi, F.
Right arrow Articles by Piga, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original article

Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications

F. Puglisi1,2,*, A. Follador2, A. M. Minisini1,2, G. G. Cardellino1,2, S. Russo1,2, C. Andreetta1,2, S. Di Terlizzi2 and A. Piga2

1 Breast Unit and 2 Clinical Oncology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

* Correspondence to: Dr F. Puglisi, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, Policlinico Universitario, Piazzale SM Misericordia, 33 100 Udine, Italy. Tel: +39-0432-559304; Fax: +39-0432-559305; Email: fabio.puglisi{at}med.uniud.it

Background: Bone scanning (BS), liver ultrasonography (LUS) and chest radiography (CXR) are commonly used in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer as part of baseline staging. However, in the absence of symptomatic disease, the usefulness of this routine diagnostic work-up is not evidence-based.

Methods: We selected the study sample from 516 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer. For each diagnostic test (BS, LUS, CXR), we analyzed the prevalence defined as the number of patients with diagnosis of metastatic disease after an imaging technique divided by the total number of patients tested. In addition, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Initial suspicion was confirmed by other independent tests (bone X-ray, computerized tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) in order to identify ‘true’ positive diagnoses.

Results: At baseline, BS was carried out in 412 patients, LUS in 412 patients and CXR in 428 patients. Thirty-three patients were correctly diagnosed by the initial staging investigations as having metastatic disease (true positive cases). BS detected skeletal metastases in 6.31% of patients, LUS detected liver metastases in 0.72% of patients and CXR detected lung metastases in 0.93% of patients. Before imaging tests, all patients with either LUS or CXR evidence of metastases were previously classified as having stage III disease. On the other hand, only 26.9% of bone metastases were detected in patients with stage III. Accordingly, the detection rate in stage III patients was 14%, 5.6% and 7.2%, respectively for BS, LUS and CXR.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that a complete diagnostic work-up to detect metastases is unnecessary in the majority of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, whereas it may be indicated for specific patient categories such as those with stage III disease.

Key words: baseline staging, bone scan, breast cancer, chest radiography, liver ultrasonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff
The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 1--Overview, Detection, and Staging
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 569 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. C. Hodgson and K. Y. Gulenchyn
Is There a Role for Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer Staging?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 712 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Chia, S. M. Swain, D. R. Byrd, and D. A. Mankoff
Locally Advanced and Inflammatory Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 786 - 790.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. R. Port, H. Yeung, M. Gonen, L. Liberman, J. Caravelli, P. Borgen, and S. Larson
18F-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Scanning Affects Surgical Management in Selected Patients With High-Risk, Operable Breast Carcinoma
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2006; 13(5): 677 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.