Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2005 16(1):97-101; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lilenbaum, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lilenbaum, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original article

Phase II randomized trial of vinorelbine and gemcitabine versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

R. C. Lilenbaum1,*, C.-S. Chen2, T. Chidiac3, P. O. Schwarzenberger4, M. Thant5, M. Versola6 and S. R. Lane7

1 The Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami Beach, FL; 2 Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA; 3 Mid-Ohio Oncology & Hematology Inc, Columbus, OH; 4 Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, New Orleans, LA; 5 Maryland Hematology Oncology Associates, Baltimore MD; 6 GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC; 7 GlaxoSmithKline, Upper Providence, PA, USA

* Correspondence to: Dr R. C. Lilenbaum, The Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4306 Alton Road, Miami Beach, FL 33140, USA. Tel: +1-305-535-3310; Fax: +1-305-535-7128; Email: rlilenba{at}salick.com

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life and overall toxicity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with vinorelbine–gemcitabine (VG) or carboplatin–paclitaxel (Taxol) (CP).

Patients and methods: A total of 165 previously untreated patients were randomized to the two regimens. Quality of life was assessed by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS). Overall toxicity and secondary efficacy end points were evaluated by standard WHO criteria.

Results: There was no significant difference in overall quality of life between the two treatments. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia, were more common in the CP arm, whereas constipation was more frequent in the VG arm. Response rates were 14.6% in the VG arm and 16.9% in the CP arm. Median survival times were 7.8 and 8.6 months, and 1 year survival rates were 38.4% and 31.9%, respectively.

Conclusions: Patients treated with VG experienced lower toxicity, but overall quality of life was similar in both arms. Efficacy seemed comparable between VG and CP. Our study shows that VG is a viable alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Key words: advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, carboplatin–paclitaxel, vinorelbine–gemcitabine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
F. Grossi, M. Aita, C. Defferrari, F. Rosetti, A. Brianti, G. Fasola, O. Vinante, P. Pronzato, and G. Pappagallo
Impact of Third-Generation Drugs on the Activity of First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analytical Approach
Oncologist, May 1, 2009; 14(5): 497 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J-P. Sculier and D. Moro-Sibilot
First- and second-line therapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2009; 33(4): 915 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.