Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2004 15(9):1344-1347; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh343
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, J. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, J. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original Article

A phase II trial of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer

Y. S. Hong1, S. Y. Song2, S. I. Lee3, H. C. Chung2, S. H. Choi3, S. H. Noh4, J. N. Park1, J. Y. Han1, J. H. Kang1, K. S. Lee1 and J. Y. Cho3,*

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Kangnam St Mary's Hospital; 2 Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Ban-po dong, Seo Cho Gu; 3 Department of Internal Medicine and 4 Department of Surgery, Yong-Dong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Do-gok dong, Kang Nam Gu, Seoul, Korea

* Correspondence to: Dr Jae Yong Cho, Yong-Dong Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Medical College, Do-gok Dong, Kang-nam Gu, Seoul, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3497-3310; Fax: +82-2-3463-3882; Email: chojy{at}yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Background: Capecitabine (Xeloda®) is a novel, oral, selectively tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine with proven activity in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. This trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer, with a view to replacing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in such patients.

Patients and methods: Forty-four patients received capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily (2500 mg/m2/day) for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest, for up to six cycles.

Results: Capecitabine produced an objective response rate of 34% (all partial responses) and stable disease in 14 patients (30%). The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 3.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7–6.4 months] and median overall survival was 9.5 months (95% CI 6.9–13.2 months). Hand-foot syndrome (HFS), nausea, anorexia, diarrhea and vomiting were the most common adverse events. While HFS was the most frequent grade 3/4 toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria), only 9% of patients experienced grade 3 HFS. Severe myelosuppression was not reported during the study.

Conclusions: Capecitabine monotherapy is active and well tolerated as first-line therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Larger comparative trials investigating capecitabine-based combination regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer are warranted.

Key words: capecitabine, gastric cancer, metastatic, untreated


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
Q. Sun, M. Hang, W. Xu, W. Mao, X. Hang, M. Li, and J. Zhang
Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine as a Second-line Treatment after Failure of 5-Fluorouracil and Platinum in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2009; (2009) hyp116v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. F. C. Okines, A. R. Norman, P. McCloud, Y.-K. Kang, and D. Cunningham
Meta-analysis of the REAL-2 and ML17032 trials: evaluating capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy and infused 5-fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 1529 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
J.-C. Jo, J.-L. Lee, M.-H. Ryu, S. J. Sym, S. S. Lee, H. M. Chang, T. W. Kim, J. S. Lee, and Y.-K. Kang
Docetaxel Monotherapy as a Second-line Treatment after Failure of Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Experience of 154 Patients with Prognostic Factor Analysis
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 37(12): 936 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. S. Lee, J.-L. Lee, M.-H. Ryu, H. M. Chang, T. W. Kim, H.-J. Kang, W. K. Kim, J. S. Lee, and Y.-K. Kang
Combination Chemotherapy with Capecitabine (X) and Cisplatin (P) as First Line Treatment in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Experience of 223 Patients with Prognostic Factor Analysis
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 37(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M Orditura, E Martinelli, G Galizia, C Carlomagno, G Aurilio, L Vecchione, E. Lieto, S De Placido, G Catalano, F Ciardiello, et al.
Weekly docetaxel and capecitabine is not effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a phase II study
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1529 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Ohtsu, S. Yoshida, and N. Saijo
Disparities in Gastric Cancer Chemotherapy Between the East and West
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2188 - 2196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Jatoi, B. R. Murphy, N. R. Foster, D. A. Nikcevich, S. R. Alberts, J. A. Knost, T. R. Fitch, and K. M. Rowland Jr
Oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia: a phase II study from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.