Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Di Leo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bleiberg, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Di Leo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bleiberg, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow 2004 - Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 15:545-549, 2004
© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology

Review Article

Is overall survival a realistic primary end point in advanced colorectal cancer studies? A critical assessment based on four clinical trials comparing fluorouracil plus leucovorin with the same treatment combined either with oxaliplatin or with CPT-11

Received 6 May 2003; revised 19 August 2003; accepted 14 September 2003

ABSTRACT

Background:

The adequacy of overall survival (OS) as study end point in phase III trials for advanced solid tumors is questionable. The present review highlights the limits of OS as study end point to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs.

Methods:

Four phase III clinical trials comparing a fluorouracil-based regimen with the same regimen plus either CPT-11 or oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer patients were reviewed. The primary aim of the critical assessment was to explain the lack of OS advantage observed in two of the four trials, despite the presence of increased response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP). Four possible reasons for the lack of OS benefit (i.e. statistical power, cross-over, magnitude of the effect on RR and TTP, non-tumor-related deaths) were systematically reviewed in the trials, and the detectable 1-year OS difference, assuming a statistical power of 80%, was calculated for each.

Results:

None of these reasons for the lack of OS advantage in presence of RR and TTP benefits convincingly explained the results of the evaluated trials. Three of the four trials had roughly the same statistical power to detect 1-year OS differences, while the fourth trial was underpowered to detect realistic OS differences. The lack of OS advantage observed in the two oxaliplatin trials is therefore likely fortuitous, and due to lack of statistical power.

Conclusions:

Although increase in OS remains the ultimate goal of many clinical trials, the choice of OS benefit as a mandatory requirement to register new compounds can lead to a serious underestimation of a drug’s real efficacy.

A. Di Leo1,*, M. Buyse2 and H. Bleiberg1

1 Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium; 2 International Drug Development Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA

Key words: colorectal cancer, overall survival, phase III trials, study end point


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
N. Methy, L. Bedenne, T. Conroy, O. Bouche, O. Chapet, M. Ducreux, J.-P. Gerard, and F. Bonnetain
Surrogate end points for overall survival and local control in neoadjuvant rectal cancer trials: statistical evaluation based on the FFCD 9203 trial
Ann. Onc., September 16, 2009; (2009) mdp340v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. Cardoso, P. L. Bedard, E. P. Winer, O. Pagani, E. Senkus-Konefka, L. J. Fallowfield, S. Kyriakides, A. Costa, T. Cufer, K. S. Albain, et al.
International Guidelines for Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Combination vs Sequential Single-Agent Chemotherapy
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 2, 2009; 101(17): 1174 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
G. Portier, D. Elias, O. Bouche, P. Rougier, J.-F. Bosset, J. Saric, J. Belghiti, P. Piedbois, R. Guimbaud, B. Nordlinger, et al.
Multicenter Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Compared With Surgery Alone After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 24(31): 4976 - 4982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. J. Epstein
Maintenance Therapy to Suppress Micrometastasis: The New Challenge for Adjuvant Cancer Treatment
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 11(15): 5337 - 5341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
P. Comella, B. Massidda, G. Filippelli, S. Palmeri, D. Natale, A. Farris, F. De Vita, F. Buzzi, S. Tafuto, L. Maiorino, et al.
Oxaliplatin plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (OXAFAFU) versus irinotecan plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (IRIFAFU) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase III trial
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 878 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
C. J. A. Punt
New options and old dilemmas in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2004; 15(10): 1453 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.