Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mauch, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mauch, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 15:261-269, 2004
© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Factors influencing treatment recommendations in early-stage Hodgkin’s disease: a survey of physicians

Received 29 April 2003; revised 27 August 2003; accepted 4 September 2003

Background:

The aim of this study was to explore variation in practice patterns and identify factors associated with physicians’ treatment decisions for early-stage Hodgkin’s disease.

Methods:

We conducted a one-time mail survey of oncologists randomly selected from directories of national oncology societies (n = 207) and Hodgkin’s disease experts (n = 147). The survey included questions on (i) physician factors, (ii) preferred treatment choices for six case scenarios of early-stage Hodgkin’s disease that varied by patient factors, and (iii) thresholds for changing treatment recommendations.

Results:

The response rate was 50%. For non-bulky Hodgkin’s disease, 69% of respondents chose combined modality therapy (CMT). On multivariate analysis, physician factors that independently predicted for choice of CMT included a high Hodgkin’s disease case load (P = 0.02) and a high percentage of patients enrolled in clinical trials (P = 0.05). Radiation oncologists had a lower threshold for adding radiation therapy (P = 0.02). More experience with second malignancy cases and longer time in practice were associated with a higher threshold for adding radiation therapy (P = 0.04 and P = 0.008, respectively). In stratified analyses, treatment decisions of non-experts were significantly influenced by physician factors, but not by patient factors. Conversely, choices of Hodgkin’s disease experts were insensitive to all physician factors, but experts were significantly more likely to select chemotherapy alone in young women and CMT in older patients.

Conclusions:

Our results indicate that physician factors including practice type and experience may in part explain variation in practice pattern for Hodgkin’s disease therapy. Hodgkin’s disease experts are more likely to tailor therapy according to individual patient factors.

A. K. Ng1,*, S. Li2, D. Neuberg2, B. Silver1, J. Weeks3 and P. Mauch1

1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; 2 Department of Biostatistical Sciences, 3 Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA

Key words: Hodgkin’s disease, physician survey, treatment decision


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Lee, S. Joffe, A. S. Artz, R. E. Champlin, S. M. Davies, M. Jagasia, N. A. Kernan, F. R. Loberiza Jr, R. J. Soiffer, and M. Eapen
Individual Physician Practice Variation in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 26(13): 2162 - 2170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.