Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2004 15(12):1731-1737; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh466
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pusztai, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pusztai, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow 2004 - Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology

Review

Clinical trial design for microarray predictive marker discovery and assessment

L. Pusztai1,* and K. R. Hess2

Departments of 1 Breast Medical Oncology and 2 Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

* Correspondence to: Dr L. Pusztai, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Unit 424, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. Tel: +1-713-792-2817; Fax: +1-713-794-4385; Email: lpusztai{at}mdanderson.org

Transcriptional profiling technologies that simultaneously measure the expression of thousands of mRNA species represent a powerful new clinical research tool. Similar to previous laboratory analytical methods including immunohistochemistry, PCR and in situ hybridization, this new technology may also find its niche in routine diagnostics. Outcome predictors discovered by these methods may be quite different from previous single-gene markers. These novel tests will probably combine the information embedded in the expression of multiple genes with mathematical prediction algorithms to formulate classification rules and predict outcome. The performance of machine learning-algorithm-based diagnostic tests may improve as they are trained on larger and larger sets of samples, and several generations of tests with improving accuracy may be introduced sequentially. Several gene-expression profiling–technology platforms are mature enough for clinical testing. The most important next step that is needed for further progress is the development and validation of multigene predictors in prospectively designed clinical trials to determine the true accuracy and clinical value of this new technology. This manuscript reviews methodological and statistical issues relevant to clinical trial design to discover and validate multigene predictors of response to therapy.

Key words: clinical trials, microarrays, gene-expression profiling, predictive markers, multigene predictors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
P. de Valpine, H.-M. Bitter, M. P. S. Brown, and J. Heller
A simulation-approximation approach to sample size planning for high-dimensional classification studies
Biostat., July 1, 2009; 10(3): 424 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Simon
The Use of Genomics in Clinical Trial Design
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 5984 - 5993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
C. I. Dumur, M. Lyons-Weiler, C. Sciulli, C. T. Garrett, I. Schrijver, T. K. Holley, J. Rodriguez-Paris, J. R. Pollack, J. L. Zehnder, M. Price, et al.
Interlaboratory Performance of a Microarray-Based Gene Expression Test to Determine Tissue of Origin in Poorly Differentiated and Undifferentiated Cancers
J. Mol. Diagn., January 1, 2008; 10(1): 67 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. S. Mehta, S. O. Zakharkin, G. L. Gadbury, and D. B. Allison
Epistemological issues in omics and high-dimensional biology: give the people what they want
Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 24 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
M. D. Onken, L. A. Worley, R. M. Davila, D. H. Char, and J. W. Harbour
Prognostic Testing in Uveal Melanoma by Transcriptomic Profiling of Fine Needle Biopsy Specimens
J. Mol. Diagn., November 1, 2006; 8(5): 567 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
J. S. Verducci, V. F. Melfi, S. Lin, Z. Wang, S. Roy, and C. K. Sen
Microarray analysis of gene expression: considerations in data mining and statistical treatment
Physiol Genomics, May 16, 2006; 25(3): 355 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Diskin, J. Kumar, Z. Cao, J. S. Schuman, T. Gilmartin, S. R. Head, and N. Panjwani
Detection of differentially expressed glycogenes in trabecular meshwork of eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 1491 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Anderson, K. R. Hess, M. Kapoor, S. Tirrell, J. Courtemanche, B. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Gong, G. N. Hortobagyi, W. F. Symmans, et al.
Reproducibility of Gene Expression Signature-Based Predictions in Replicate Experiments
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1721 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
D. J. Kerr
Concordia res parvae crescent
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. H. Smorenburg, G. J. Peters, C. J. van Groeningen, P. Noordhuis, K. Smid, A. M. G. H. van Riel, W. Dercksen, H. M. Pinedo, and G. Giaccone
Phase II study of tailored chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer with either 5-fluouracil and leucovorin or oxaliplatin and irinotecan based on the expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. Simon
Roadmap for Developing and Validating Therapeutically Relevant Genomic Classifiers
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2005; 23(29): 7332 - 7341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.