Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2004 15(10):1535-1542; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh387
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faleiro-Rodrigues, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faleiro-Rodrigues, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original Article

Prognostic value of E-cadherin immunoexpression in patients with primary ovarian carcinomas

C. Faleiro-Rodrigues1,*, I. Macedo-Pinto1,*, D. Pereira2 and C. S. Lopes1

Departments of 1 Anatomy and Pathology and 2 Medical Oncology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Francisco Gentil, Centro Regional do Norte, Porto, Portugal

* Correspondence to: Dr C. Faleiro-Rodrigues or I. Macedo-Pinto, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Centro Regional do Norte, Departamento de Anatomia Patológica, Rua Dr António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal. Tel: +351-22-5084000 ext. 5111; Fax: +351-22-5084001; Email: cristinafaleiro{at}mail.com

Purpose: To analyse the negative versus positive immunoexpression of E-cadherin in patients with primary ovarian carcinomas, and determine its significance in relation to clinicopathological features, overall and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Patients and methods: The protein expression of E-cadherin was immunohistochemically evaluated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples in 104 patients with primary ovarian carcinomas. The clinicopathological factors studied were age, FIGO staging, histological type, tumour differentiation, the appearance of the ovarian capsule, peritoneal implants and residual tumour after cytoreductive surgery. Overall survival and RFS were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and multivariate analysis was completed using the Cox regression model.

Results: Of the 104 carcinomas, negative E-cadherin immunoexpression was observed in seven (7%) cases, and positive immunoexpression in 97 (93%). E-cadherin categorised into negative versus positive expression did not associate with any of the established clinicopathological parameters. However, negative E-cadherin expression significantly predicted a poorer overall survival when compared with positive expression (P=0.006). In the multivariate analyses, negative E-cadherin and the presence of residual tumour after cytoreductive surgery were independent prognostic factors for survival (P=0.014 and P=0.034, respectively).

Conclusions: The presence of residual tumour after primary cytoreductive surgery and negative E-cadherin expression seem to be useful markers in patients with ovarian carcinomas likely to have an unfavourable clinical outcome. The assessment of E-cadherin immunoreactivity may be a useful prognostic indicator in ovarian cancer, complementary to established prognostic factors.

Key words: cell-to-cell adhesion, epithelial cadherin, immunohistochemistry


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
K A Voutilainen, M A Anttila, S M Sillanpaa, K M Ropponen, S V Saarikoski, M T Juhola, and V-M Kosma
Prognostic significance of E-cadherin-catenin complex in epithelial ovarian cancer
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 59(5): 460 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. M. Eder, X. Sui, D. G. Rosen, L. K Nolden, K. W. Cheng, J. P. Lahad, M. Kango-Singh, K. H. Lu, C. L. Warneke, E. N. Atkinson, et al.
Atypical PKC{iota} contributes to poor prognosis through loss of apical-basal polarity and Cyclin E overexpression in ovarian cancer
PNAS, August 30, 2005; 102(35): 12519 - 12524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. B. Makarla, M. H. Saboorian, R. Ashfaq, K. O. Toyooka, S. Toyooka, J. D. Minna, A. F. Gazdar, and J. O. Schorge
Promoter Hypermethylation Profile of Ovarian Epithelial Neoplasms
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 11(15): 5365 - 5369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.