Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Assersohn, L.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Assersohn, L.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 15:64-69, 2004
© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Phase II study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma

Received 28 July 2003; revised 4 August 2003; accepted 13 August 2003

Background:

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in primary refractory or relapsed locally advanced or metastatic oesophagogastric (O-G) carcinoma.

Patients and methods:

Patients with documented progression on or within 3 months of chemotherapy were recruited between July 2000 and May 2002. Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) was given with 5-FU (400 mg/m2 bolus) and leucovorin (folinic acid) (125 mg/m2) followed by 5-FU (1200 mg/m2 infusion over 48 h) every 2 weeks. Response confirmed by computed tomography was assessed at 12 and 24 weeks.

Results:

Thirty-eight of 40 registered patients (95%) were assessable. Median follow-up was 9.3 months and median age was 59.0 years. Thirty-three patients (86.8%) had metastatic disease and 37 patients (97.4%) had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval 15.4% to 45.9%) while an additional 34% had stable disease. Improvement in tumour-related symptoms included dysphagia 78.6%, reflux 60.0%, pain 54.5%, anorexia 64.3% and weight loss 72.7%. Grade 3/4 toxicities were anaemia 13.2%, neutropenia 26.4%, febrile neutropenia 5.2%, stomatitis 2.6%, nausea and vomiting 13.2% and diarrhoea 7.9%. Median failure-free survival was 3.7 months and median overall survival was 6.4 months.

Conclusion:

5-FU/irinotecan is a valuable regimen for second-line treatment in 5-FU/platinum-resistant O-G carcinoma.

L. Assersohn1, G. Brown1, D. Cunningham1,*, C. Ward1, J. Oates1, J. S. Waters1, M. E. Hill2 and A. R. Norman1

1 Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Sutton, Surrey; 2 MidKent Oncology Centre, Maidstone, Kent, UK

Key words: advanced, cancer, gastric, irinotecan, oesophageal, second-line


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Jackson, D. Cunningham, J. Oliveira, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(suppl_4): iv34 - iv36.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M.-D. Seo, K.-W. Lee, J. H. Lim, H. G. Yi, D.-Y. Kim, D.-Y. Oh, J. H. Kim, S.-A. Im, T.-Y. Kim, J. S. Lee, et al.
Irinotecan Combined with 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin as Second-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic or Relapsed Gastric Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2008; 38(9): 589 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S.-G. Kim, S. Y. Oh, H.-C. Kwon, S. Lee, J. H. Kim, S.-H. Kim, and H.-J. Kim
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan with Bi-weekly, Low-dose Leucovorin and Bolus and Continuous Infusion 5-fluorouracil (Modified FOLFIRI) as Salvage Therapy for Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., October 8, 2007; (2007) hym103v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. R. Ferry, M. Anderson, K. Beddard, S. Tomlinson, P. Atherfold, J. Obszynska, R. Harrison, and J. Jankowski
A Phase II Study of Gefitinib Monotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Evidence of Gene Expression, Cellular, and Clinical Response
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5869 - 5875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. L. Janmaat, M. I. Gallegos-Ruiz, J. A. Rodriguez, G. A. Meijer, W. L. Vervenne, D. J. Richel, C. Van Groeningen, and G. Giaccone
Predictive Factors for Outcome in a Phase II Study of Gefitinib in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Esophageal Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2006; 24(10): 1612 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Pozzo, C. Barone, J. Szanto, E. Padi, C. Peschel, J. Bukki, V. Gorbunova, V. Valvere, J. Zaluski, M. Biakhov, et al.
Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2004; 15(12): 1773 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
O. Bouche, J. L. Raoul, F. Bonnetain, M. Giovannini, P. L. Etienne, G. Lledo, D. Arsene, J. F. Paitel, V. Guerin-Meyer, E. Mitry, et al.
Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of a Biweekly Regimen of Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 Plus Cisplatin, or LV5FU2 Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study--FFCD 9803
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2004; 22(21): 4319 - 4328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.