Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ten Bokkel Huinink, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ten Bokkel Huinink, W.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 15:100-103, 2004
© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Long-term survival in a phase III, randomised study of topotecan versus paclitaxel in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Received 22 May 2003; revised 22 August 2003; accepted 17 September 2003

Background:

We have continued to monitor the survival of patients randomised in a previously reported multicentre phase III study of topotecan versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who had failed one prior platinum-based regimen.

Patients and methods:

Patients with bidimensionally measurable disease were randomised to topotecan (1.5 mg/m2/day for 5 days) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2/day as a 3-h infusion) every 21 days. Patients were eligible for treatment with the alternate therapy at third line. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QOL)-C30 questionnaire was also used to measure eight symptoms at baseline and during each course (pain, anorexia, diarrhoea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, constipation and insomnia).

Results:

A total of 226 patients were evaluable for response. Demographic characteristics were similar in both treatment groups, as were results of the EORTC QOL-30 questionnaire. For the topotecan group, median time to progression was 18.9 weeks (range <1 to 92.6+ weeks; 25% censored), and, for paclitaxel, 14.7 weeks (range <1 to 137.3+ weeks; 12.3% censored); P = 0.076. At 4 years post-randomisation, median survival in the topotecan group was 63.0 weeks (range <1 to 238.4+ weeks; 20.5% censored) and, for paclitaxel, 53.0 weeks (range <1 to 226.3+ weeks; 12.3% censored); P = 0.44.

Conclusion:

Topotecan continues to demonstrate comparable efficacy and survival to paclitaxel with manageable and non-cumulative haematological toxicity. Non-haematological toxicity was generally mild for both groups. The long-term survival rate indicates substantial therapeutic benefit for this group of patients receiving topotecan at relapse of ovarian cancer.

W. ten Bokkel Huinink1,*, S. R. Lane2 and G. A. Ross2

1 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2 GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA and Harlow, UK

Key words: ovarian carcinoma, paclitaxel, platinum, topotecan


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. M. Del Campo, A. Roszak, M. Bidzinski, T. E. Ciuleanu, T. Hogberg, M. Z. Wojtukiewicz, A. Poveda, K. Boman, A. M. Westermann, C. Lebedinsky, et al.
Phase II randomized study of trabectedin given as two different every 3 weeks dose schedules (1.5 mg/m2 24 h or 1.3 mg/m2 3 h) to patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, advanced ovarian cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1794 - 1802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. A. Bookman, M. F. Brady, W. P. McGuire, P. G. Harper, D. S. Alberts, M. Friedlander, N. Colombo, J. M. Fowler, P. A. Argenta, K. De Geest, et al.
Evaluation of New Platinum-Based Treatment Regimens in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1419 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Ferrandina, M. Ludovisi, D. Lorusso, S. Pignata, E. Breda, A. Savarese, P. Del Medico, L. Scaltriti, D. Katsaros, D. Priolo, et al.
Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Progressive or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 890 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
K. S. Garman, J. R. Nevins, and A. Potti
Genomic strategies for personalized cancer therapy
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2007; 16(R2): R226 - R232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. G. Mutch, M. Orlando, T. Goss, M. G. Teneriello, A. N. Gordon, S. D. McMeekin, Y. Wang, D. R. Scribner Jr, M. Marciniack, R. W. Naumann, et al.
Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 25(19): 2811 - 2818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Pfisterer, B. Weber, A. Reuss, R. Kimmig, A. du Bois, U. Wagner, H. Bourgeois, W. Meier, S. Costa, J.-U. Blohmer, et al.
Randomized phase III trial of topotecan following carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic cancer intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR and GINECO.
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 2, 2006; 98(15): 1036 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro Oncol DukeHome page
R. Saito, M. T. Krauze, C. O. Noble, D. C. Drummond, D. B. Kirpotin, M. S. Berger, J. W. Park, and K. S. Bankiewicz
Convection-enhanced delivery of Ls-TPT enables an effective, continuous, low-dose chemotherapy against malignant glioma xenograft model
Neuro-oncol, July 1, 2006; 8(3): 205 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Apolone and A. Buda
Topotecan versus paclitaxel in second-line therapy: a lost opportunity for quality-of-life evaluation?
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 1443 - 1444.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.