Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cocconi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pucci, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cocconi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Pucci, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 14:1258-1263, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (PELF) is more active than 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric carcinoma

G. Cocconi1,+, P. Carlini2, A. Gamboni1, S. Gasperoni3, C. Rodinò4, S. Zironi5, G. Bisagni6, S. Porrozzi7, F. Cognetti2, F. Di Costanzo3, R. Canaletti4, E.M. Ruggeri2, R. Camisa1 and F. Pucci1

1 Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Parma; 2 Regina Elena Institute, Rome; 3 Medical Oncology Service, Azienda Sanitaria Locale, Terni; 4 Medical Oncology Service, Azienda Sanitaria Locale, Piacenza; 5 Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Osperdaliera Universitaria, Modena; 6 Medical Oncology Service, Azienda Osperdaliera, Reggio Emilia; 7 Medical Oncology Division, Azienda Osperdaliera Universitaria, Perugia, Italy

Received 11 October 2002, revised 9 January 2003, accepted 8 April 2003;

Background:

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) and cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-FU (PELF) have both been reported to be superior to the combination 5-FU, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) in advanced gastric carcinoma. On the basis of the presence and dose intensity of the included agents, we hypothesised that PELF would be superior to FAMTX.

Patients and methods:

Two hundred patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomised to receive PELF or FAMTX for a maximum of six cycles or until disease progression.

Results:

The complete response (CR) rates to PELF and FAMTX were, respectively, 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 6% to 20%] and 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%; P = 0.003), and the objective response rates [CR plus partial response (PR) rates] 39% (95% CI 29% to 49%) and 22% (95% CI 13% to 30%; P = 0.009), thus significantly favouring the PELF combination. The survival rates after 12 months (30.8% versus 22.4%) and 24 months (15.7% versus 9.5%) were also higher among patients receiving PELF, but these differences were not statistically significant. The toxicities were qualitatively different but quantitatively similar. Both regimens seem to be feasible provided that careful patient monitoring is assured.

Conclusions:

PELF is significantly more active than FAMTX and deserves further research in the adjuvant setting.

Key words: advanced gastric carcinoma, chemotherapy, FAMTX combination, PELF combination


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
I. Chau, A. R. Norman, D. Cunningham, J. Oates, R. Hawkins, T. Iveson, M. Nicolson, P. Harper, M. Seymour, and T. Hickish
The impact of primary tumour origins in patients with advanced oesophageal, oesophago-gastric junction and gastric adenocarcinoma--individual patient data from 1775 patients in four randomised controlled trials
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 885 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. Di Costanzo, S. Gasperoni, L. Manzione, G. Bisagni, R. Labianca, S. Bravi, E. Cortesi, P. Carlini, R. Bracci, S. Tomao, et al.
Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Completely Resected Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial Conducted by GOIRC
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2008; 100(6): 388 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Wu and J. Ji
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer or Not: A Dilemma?
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2008; 100(6): 376 - 377.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Cascinu, R. Labianca, C. Barone, A. Santoro, C. Carnaghi, A. Cassano, G. D. Beretta, V. Catalano, O. Bertetto, S. Barni, et al.
Adjuvant Treatment of High-Risk, Radically Resected Gastric Cancer Patients With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Cisplatin, and Epidoxorubicin in a Randomized Controlled Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 18, 2007; 99(8): 601 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
W Ichikawa and Y Sasaki
Correlation between tumor response to first-line chemotherapy and prognosis in advanced gastric cancer patients
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 1665 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. D. Wagner, W. Grothe, J. Haerting, G. Kleber, A. Grothey, and W. E. Fleig
Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Aggregate Data
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2903 - 2909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Lim, M. Michael, G. B. Mann, and T. Leong
Adjuvant Therapy in Gastric Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 23(25): 6220 - 6232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Pozzo, C. Barone, J. Szanto, E. Padi, C. Peschel, J. Bukki, V. Gorbunova, V. Valvere, J. Zaluski, M. Biakhov, et al.
Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2004; 15(12): 1773 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.