Annals of Oncology 14:1039-1044, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology
Original Paper |
Prospective randomized comparison of vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) administered as intravenous bolus injection and VAD with liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment in multiple myeloma
1 Department of Clinical Therapeutics and Internal Medicine, University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens; 2 Saint Savvas Cancer Hospital, Athens; 3 Department of Hematology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki; 4 Department of Hematology, Genimatas General Hospital, Athens; 5 Department of Hematology, University of Patra, Patra; 6 Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Pireus; 7 Department of Hematology, Democritus University, Alexandroupolis; 8 Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki; 9 Sismanoglion Hospital, Athens; 10 Airforce General Hospital, Athens; 11 General Hospital of Kerkira, Kerkira; 12 Venizelion Hospital, Heraklion; 13 Department of Blood Bank and Laboratory Hematology, Univarsity of Patra, Patra, Greece
Received 12 December 2002; revised 14 February 2003; accepted 18 March 2003
Background:
The combination of vincristine and doxorubicin administered as a continuous infusion via an indwelling catheter together with intermittent high-dose dexamethasone (VAD) is an effective primary treatment for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. In order to avoid the need for an indwelling catheter, which imposes logistic problems for outpatient administration, several phase II studies have explored the feasibility and efficacy of VAD-like outpatient regimens. We designed a prospective randomized study to compare the objective response rates of two VAD-like outpatient regimens as primary treatment for symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma.
Patients and methods:
Patients were entered in a randomized study regardless of age, performance status and renal function. One hundred and twenty-seven patients received VAD bolus, which consisted of vincristine 0.4 mg i.v., doxorubicin 9 mg/m2 i.v. and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for four consecutive days and 132 patients received VAD doxil, which consisted of vincristine 2 mg i.v. and liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. daily for 4 days. The two regimens were administered every 28 days for four courses and in courses 1 and 3, in both arms, dexamethasone was also given on days 912 and 1720.
Results:
An objective response was documented in 61.4% and 61.3% of patients treated with VAD bolus and VAD doxil, respectively. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild or moderate and equally distributed between the two treatment arms with the exception of alopecia, which was more common after VAD bolus, and of palmarplantar erythrodysesthesia, which was more common after VAD doxil.
Conclusions:
Our multicenter trial, which included an unselected patient population, indicated that both VAD bolus and VAD doxil can be administered to outpatients and can provide an equal opportunity of rapid response in many patients with multiple myeloma.
Key words: chemotherapy, liposomal doxorubicin, multiple myeloma
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K Zervas, D Mihou, E Katodritou, A Pouli, C. Mitsouli, A Anagnostopoulos, S Delibasi, M. Kyrtsonis, N Anagnostopoulos, E Terpos, et al. VAD-doxil versus VAD-doxil plus thalidomide as initial treatment for multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized trial of the Greek myeloma study group Ann. Onc., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 1369 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dispenzieri, S. V. Rajkumar, M. A. Gertz, M. Q. Lacy, R. A. Kyle, P. R. Greipp, T. E. Witzig, J. A. Lust, S. J. Russell, S. R. Hayman, et al. Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Based on Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART): Consensus Statement Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2007; 82(3): 323 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Woodley-Cook, L. Y.Y. Shin, L. Swystun, S. Caruso, S. Beaudin, and P. C. Liaw Effects of the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin on the protein C anticoagulant pathway Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 3303 - 3311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Moulopoulos, D. Gika, A. Anagnostopoulos, K. Delasalle, D. Weber, R. Alexanian, and M. A. Dimopoulos Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma Ann. Onc., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 1824 - 1828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kerr A word in your ear: the 2004 Annals of Oncology prizes Ann. Onc., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 1303 - 1304. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Zervas, M. A. Dimopoulos, E. Hatzicharissi, A. Anagnostopoulos, M. Papaioannou, Ch. Mitsouli, P. Panagiotidis, J. Korantzis, M. Tzilianos, and A. Maniatis Primary treatment of multiple myeloma with thalidomide, vincristine, liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone (T-VAD doxil): a phase II multicenter study Ann. Onc., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 134 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


