Annals of Oncology 14:946-957, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology
Original Paper |
Cancer prevalence in Northern Europe: the EUROPREVAL study

1 Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Lund University, and Regional Tumour Registry, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, and Estonian Cancer Registry, North Estonian Regional Hospital Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia; 3 Finnish Cancer Registry and Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; 4 Department of Cancer Prevention and Documentation, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; 5 Icelandic Cancer Registry, Reykjavik, Iceland; 6 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Roma; 7 Division of Epidemiology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
Received 10 January 2002; revised 31 January 2003; accepted 24 February 2003
Background:
Information on cancer prevalence is of importance for health planning and resource allocation, but is not always available. In order to obtain such data in a comparable way a systematic evaluation of cancer prevalence in Europe was undertaken within the EUROPREVAL project.
Patients and methods:
Standardised data were collected from 38 population-based registries on almost 3 million cancer patients diagnosed between 1970 and 1992. The prevalence of 11 specific cancer types was estimated at the index date of 31 December 1992. This study deals with the northern countries Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland and Sweden.
Results:
There were large differences between these countries, Sweden having the highest prevalence rate of 3050 per 100 000 and Estonia the lowest, 1339 per 100 000. This difference is mainly due to a high proportion of cancers with favourable prognosis such as breast cancer, prostate cancer and melanoma, better survival and longer life expectancy in Sweden, whereas Estonia has a higher proportion of stomach and lung cancer with poor prognosis, worse survival and much shorter life expectancy, especially for males. For most tumour types, the Nordic countries did better than Estonia. There are indications that cancer patients in Estonia, as well as in Denmark, have a more advanced stage at diagnosis and that the Estonian health-care system is less efficient.
Conclusions:
Despite many similarities and a common historical background, the northern countries in Europe that participated in the EUROPREVAL study display quite different cancer patterns and prevalence. Reasons for these variations are discussed.
Key words: cancer, EUROPREVAL study, incidence, Northern Europe, prevalence, survival
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. K. Nihtila, P. T. Martikainen, S. V.P. Koskinen, A. R. Reunanen, A. M. Noro, and U. T. Hakkinen Chronic conditions and the risk of long-term institutionalization among older people Eur J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 18(1): 77 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
