Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mangel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Berinstein, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mangel, J.
Right arrow Articles by Berinstein, N. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 14:758-765, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Pharmacokinetic study of patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma treated with rituximab as ‘in vivo purge’ and consolidative immunotherapy following autologous stem cell transplantation

J. Mangel1, R. Buckstein1, K. Imrie1, D. Spaner1, E. Franssen1, P. Pavlin1, A. Boudreau1, N. Pennell1, D. Combs2 and N. L. Berinstein1,+

1 The Advanced Therapeutics Program, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2 Genentech, San Francisco, CA, USA

Received 4 October 2002; revised 16 December 2002; accepted 17 January 2003

Background:

Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of rituximab in an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) setting.

Patients and methods:

We evaluated serum rituximab levels in 26 patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma treated with a combination of ASCT and immunotherapy. Patients received nine infusions of rituximab (375 mg/m2): one dose as an ‘in vivo purge’ prior to stem cell collection, and two 4-week cycles at 8 and 24 weeks following ASCT. Pre- and post-infusion serum rituximab levels were measured during the purging dose, with doses 1 and 4 of both sets of maintenance rituximab cycles, and 12 weeks and 24 weeks following treatment.

Results:

Rituximab levels were detectable after the first infusion, and peaked at a mean concentration of 463.8 µg/ml after the final dose. Levels remained detectable 24 weeks after completion of treatment. There was a trend toward higher rituximab levels in patients with follicular lymphoma. Serum concentrations achieved during the maintenance cycles were similar to levels observed in patients with measurable lymphoma treated during ‘the pivotal trial’. No correlation was observed between serum rituximab levels achieved in the minimal disease state and the risk of later clinical relapse, nor with the ability to achieve a molecular remission following ASCT.

Conclusions:

The finding that patients treated in minimal disease states and at the time of active disease both achieve similar final serum rituximab concentrations after four infusions suggests that the pharmacokinetics are complex, and may not necessarily correlate with disease burden. The precise factors influencing rituximab clearance in patients with lymphoma are unresolved, and this remains an area of active research.

Key words: autologous stem cell transplantation, pharmacokinetics, rituximab


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
D. Dayde, D. Ternant, M. Ohresser, S. Lerondel, S. Pesnel, H. Watier, A. Le Pape, P. Bardos, G. Paintaud, and G. Cartron
Tumor burden influences exposure and response to rituximab: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling using a syngeneic bioluminescent murine model expressing human CD20
Blood, April 16, 2009; 113(16): 3765 - 3772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. K. Gopal, O. W. Press, S. M. Wilbur, D. G. Maloney, and J. M. Pagel
Rituximab blocks binding of radiolabeled anti-CD20 antibodies (Ab) but not radiolabeled anti-CD45 Ab
Blood, August 1, 2008; 112(3): 830 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
C. M. Ng, R. Bruno, D. Combs, and B. Davies
Population Pharmacokinetics of Rituximab (Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody) in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients During a Phase II Clinical Trial
J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 45(7): 792 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. N. Gordan, W. B. Grow, A. Pusateri, V. Douglas, N. P. Mendenhall, and J. W. Lynch
Phase II Trial of Individualized Rituximab Dosing for Patients With CD20-Positive Lymphoproliferative Disorders
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2005; 23(6): 1096 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.