Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etienne, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milano, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Etienne, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Milano, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 14:643-647, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Pharmacokinetics of low-dose carboplatin and applicability of a method of calculation for estimating individual drug clearance

M. C. Etienne1, F. Leger2, X. Pivot1, E. Chatelut2, R. J. Bensadoun1, E. Guardiola1, N. Renée1, N. Magné1, P. Canal2 and G. Milano1,+

1 Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice; 2 Institut Claudius-Regaud, Toulouse, France

Received 16 May 2002; revised 12 November 2002; accepted 3 December 2002

Background:

Carboplatin is the only cancer drug for which conventional doses are individually adjusted according to estimated clearance and target area under the curve (AUC). The aim of this prospective study was (i) to evaluate intra- and interpatient variability of ultrafilterable (UF) carboplatin AUC0–{infty} and (ii) to test whether the prediction of carboplatin clearance according to the Chatelut formula established for conventional carboplatin doses was accurate for low carboplatin doses.

Materials and methods:

Thirty-one head and neck cancer patients (29 men, two women, mean age 55.9 years) received concomitant radiotherapy (R{gamma} 2 Gy/day) and chemotherapy (carboplatin 50 mg/m2/day i.v.) for 7 weeks: R{gamma} was administered 5 days/week (days 1–5) and carboplatin 2 days/week (days 1 and 4). Pharmacokinetics was performed once per week. A limited sample strategy based on Bayesian analysis was first validated and blood was subsequently taken 1 and 4 h after the end of carboplatin administration.

Results:

A total of 143 cycles was analyzed. Ultrafilterable carboplatin AUC0–{infty} ranged from 0.360 to 4.200 mg·min/ml (mean 0.830, median 0.670). As a corollary, UF carboplatin clearance ranged from 19.1 to 244.7 ml/min. Ultrafilterable carboplatin concentrations were very stable over time: AUC0–{infty} variability due to treatment duration contributed to <1% of the total variance, while interpatient variability contributed to 68.6%. Accordingly, intrasubject effect was not significant (P = 0.38) whereas intersubject effect was highly significant (P <0.001). These results suggest that optimal dosage for targeting a given AUC may vary within a 13-fold range between patients. The Chatelut formula, based on creatininemia, body weight, age and sex, over estimates carboplatin clearance by 40% on average (bias 95% CI 29.6% to 51.1%). No significant relationship was observed between either bone marrow toxicity or creatinine clearance decrease and carboplatin pharmacokinetics.

Conclusions:

The Chatelut carboplatin clearance model established for conventional carboplatin dosages (>100 mg/m2) is not applicable for targeting low AUC (<1 mg·min/ml).

Key words: carboplatin disposition, Chatelut formula, head and neck cancer, low-dose carboplatin, pharmacokinetic, radiotherapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.