Annals of Oncology 14:400-405, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology
Original Paper |
Cancer physicians’ attitudes toward colorectal cancer follow-up
1 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre and Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa; 3 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa; 4 Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Received 13 June 2002; revised 11 September 2002; accepted 2 October 2002
Background:
The optimal follow-up strategy for colorectal cancer is unknown.
Materials and methods:
We surveyed all Canadian radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and surgeons specializing in colorectal cancer to assess their recommendations for follow-up after potentially curative treatment, the beliefs and attitudes underlying these practices, and the cost implications of different follow-up strategies.
Results:
One hundred and sixty practitioners (58%) returned completed surveys. Most recommended clinical assessments every 3–4 months in the first 2 years including carcino-embryonic antigen testing, gradually decreasing in frequency over 5 years. Ninety per cent recommend a surveillance colonoscopy in the first year. The majority felt that specialist involvement in follow-up was important because of the increased opportunities for patients to contribute to research (76%) and teaching (73%). About half felt that specialists were more efficient at providing follow-up than primary care physicians, but these same physicians recommended significantly longer and more expensive follow-up routines on average than others. Primary care physicians were felt to be important allies, especially in managing the psychosocial concerns of patients.
Conclusions:
Surveillance practices are generally in keeping with published recommendations. Most specialists feel that they should remain involved in follow-up, but this may result in increased resource utilization.
Key words: colorectal cancer, costs, follow-up, physician survey
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. E. Del Giudice, E. Grunfeld, B. J. Harvey, E. Piliotis, and S. Verma Primary Care Physicians' Views of Routine Follow-Up Care of Cancer Survivors J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2009; 27(20): 3338 - 3345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. G. Pfister, A. B. Benson III, and M. R. Somerfield Surveillance Strategies after Curative Treatment of Colorectal Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., June 3, 2004; 350(23): 2375 - 2382. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|