Annals of Oncology 14:353-357, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology
Review Article |
More on the regulation of tobacco smoke: how we got here and where next
1 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; 2 Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, PA, USA
Received 15 July 2002; accepted 22 October 2002
Abstract
The modern cigarette is unnecessarily dangerous. Despite being lower in tar yield, and consequently in squamo-carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons such as benzo[a]pyrene, the nitrosamine yields are often higher than they need to be. Also, reductions in tar levels have not led to the consequential reductions in mortality that were anticipated several decades ago. The modern cigarette is also smoother, easier to smoke and to learn how to smoke, highly addictive and facilitates compensatory smoking. Compensatory smoking leads to excess inhalation of carcinogens and toxins in the hunt for nicotine. Its labelling is misleading in that supposedly low-yielding cigarettes may, due to compensation occurring as a result of cigarette design, lead to inhalation of much higher amounts of nicotine, carcinogens and toxins than the smoker is led to expect. Regulation of the product is needed to provide the persistent smoker with a cigarette lower in risk, accurately labelled, providing a relatively consistent and known dose of nicotine, and less likely to facilitate compensatory smoking. This will not produce a safe cigarette but should result in a reduction in harm if seriously implemented.
Key words: benzo[a]pyrene, compensation, filtration, nicotine, nitrosamines, smoking
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A McDaniel and R. E Malone "I always thought they were all pure tobacco": American smokers' perceptions of "natural" cigarettes and tobacco industry advertising strategies Tob. Control, December 1, 2007; 16(6): e7 - e7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L T Kozlowski, R J O'Connor, G A Giovino, C A Whetzel, J Pauly, and K M Cummings Maximum yields might improve public health--if filter vents were banned: a lesson from the history of vented filters Tob. Control, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 262 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L T Kozlowski, N A Dreschel, S D Stellman, J Wilkenfeld, E B Weiss, and M E Goldberg An extremely compensatible cigarette by design: documentary evidence on industry awareness and reactions to the Barclay filter design cheating the tar testing system Tob. Control, February 1, 2005; 14(1): 64 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Gray and P Boyle The case of the disappearing nitrosamines: a potentially global phenomenon Tob. Control, March 1, 2004; 13(1): 13 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Borland A strategy for controlling the marketing of tobacco products: a regulated market model Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(4): 374 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W King, S M Carter, R Borland, S Chapman, and N Gray The Australian tar derby: the origins and fate of a low tar harm reduction programme Tob. Control, December 1, 2003; 12(90003): iii61 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
