Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, A.
Right arrow Articles by Glimelius, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berglund, A.
Right arrow Articles by Glimelius, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:1430-1437, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Tumour markers as early predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced colorectal carcinoma

Å. Berglund1,+, D. Molin1, A. Larsson2, R. Einarsson3 and B. Glimelius1

Departments of 1 Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology, and 2 Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala; 3 Division of Research and Development, AB Sangtec Medical, Bromma, Sweden

Received 9 November 2001; revised 4 February 2002; accepted 6 March 2002

Background:

To evaluate the reliability and validity of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in monitoring palliative chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC).

Methods:

Serum was prospectively collected from 87 patients with ACRC treated with first-line 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin before and 2, 4 and 10 weeks after induction.

Results:

Eight patients had normal baseline TPS levels, and these patients had a favourable outcome with prolonged survival and a higher rate of objective responses than patients with elevated TPS levels. At 10 weeks, all responders had a decreasing TPS value. The sensitivity for a decrease of >25% using TPS was 83% and 86% for objective and subjective responses, respectively, and the specificity was 65% and 72%, respectively. CEA had, in the same setting, a sensitivity of 45% and 46%, respectively, and the specificity was 88%. VEGF was elevated in 54% of the patients and bFGF in 15% of the patients. The VEGF values decreased during therapy in 94% of the patients, but the changes in serial VEGF values did not correlate with survival or response. Tumour markers used together did not enhance the predictive values of TPS alone.

Conclusions:

Repeated measurements of CEA, VEGF and bFGF in serum are of limited value in monitoring chemotherapy in ACRC. TPS seems to be of greater interest, but does not predict exactly which patients are going to have a positive outcome of palliative chemotherapy.

Key words: bFGF, CEA, colorectal carcinoma, palliative chemotherapy, TPS, VEGF


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. Y. Kim, M. K. Kee, S. A. Chong, and M. J. Nam
Galanin Is Up-Regulated in Colon Adenocarcinoma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2373 - 2378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
J Heidemann, D G Binion, W Domschke, and T Kucharzik
Antiangiogenic therapy in human gastrointestinal malignancies.
Gut, October 1, 2006; 55(10): 1497 - 1511.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. Nam, M. K. Kee, R. Kuick, and S. M. Hanash
Identification of Defensin {alpha}6 as a Potential Biomarker in Colon Adenocarcinoma
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 8260 - 8265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.