Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tobinai, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Itoh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Tobinai, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:1347-1355, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Randomized phase II study of biweekly CHOP and dose-escalated CHOP with prophylactic use of lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9505

K. Itoh1,+, T. Ohtsu1, H. Fukuda2, Y. Sasaki1, M. Ogura3, Y. Morishima3, T. Chou4, K. Aikawa5, N. Uike6, F. Mizorogi7, T. Ohno8, S. Ikeda9, T. Sai10, M. Taniwaki11, F. Kawano12, M. Niimi2, T. Hotta13, M. Shimoyama14 and K. Tobinai15,§

1 Division of Hematology and Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa; 2 JCOG Data Center, Cancer Information and Epidemiology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo; 3 Department of Hematology and Chemotherapy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya; 4 Department of Medical Oncology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata; 5 Department of Hematology, Sapporo National Hospital, Sapporo; 6 Department of Hematology, National Kyusyu Cancer Center, Fukuoka; 7 Department of Internal Medicine, Daisan Hospital, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo; 8 Division of Hematology and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohtsu Red Cross Hospital, Ohtsu; 9 Department of Hematology, Sasebo City General Hospital, Sasebo, 10 Department of Internal Medicine, Iwaki Kyoritsu General Hospital, Iwaki; 11 Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University School of Medicine, Kyoto; 12 Institute for Clinical Research, Kumamoto National Hospital, Kumamoto; 13 Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University, Isehara; 14 Nagoya National Hospital, Nagoya; 15 Hematology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Received 10 December 2001; revised 20 March 2002; accepted 22 May 2002

Background:

CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) is accepted as the best available standard treatment for first-line chemotherapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). However, the therapeutic efficacy of CHOP remains unsatisfactory, particularly in high-intermediate risk and high risk patients, and a new strategy is warranted in this patient population. The aim of the present study was to explore a suitable therapeutic-intensified regimen for the treatment of aggressive NHL.

Patients and methods:

Between May 1995 and July 1998, a total of 70 patients with high-intermediate risk or high risk aggressive NHL, according to the International Prognostic Index, were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either eight cycles of standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 and prednisolone 100 mg for 5 days) every 2 weeks, or six cycles of dose-escalated CHOP (cyclophosphamide 1,500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 70 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 and prednisolone 100 mg for 5 days) every 3 weeks. Lenograstim (glycosylated rHuG-CSF), at a dose of 2 µg/kg/day s.c., was administered daily from day 3 until day 13 with biweekly CHOP and until day 20 with the dose-escalated CHOP. The primary endpoint was complete response rate.

Results:

The complete response rate was 60% [21 of 35; 95% confidence interval (CI) 42% to 76%] with biweekly CHOP and 51% (18 of 35; 95% CI 34% to 69%) with dose-escalated CHOP. The major toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia and was more frequent in the dose-escalated CHOP arm (86%) than in the biweekly CHOP arm (50%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was also more frequent in the dose-escalated CHOP arm (20%) than the biweekly CHOP arm (3%). Non-hematological toxicities were acceptable in both arms. One treatment-related death (due to cardiac arrhythmia) was observed in a dose-escalated CHOP patient. Progression-free survival at 3 years was 43% (95% CI 27% to 59%) in the biweekly CHOP arm and 31% (95% CI 16% to 47%) in the dose-escalated CHOP arm. Although seven patients were deemed ineligible by central review of the pathological diagnosis, the results for both eligible and all enrolled patients were similar.

Conclusions:

Similar complete response rates and progression-free survival rates, but lower toxicity, indicated that biweekly CHOP was superior to dose-escalated CHOP in the treatment of aggressive NHL. Based on these results, the Lymphoma Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group is conducting a randomized phase III study comparing biweekly CHOP with standard CHOP in newly diagnosed patients with advanced-stage aggressive NHL.

Key words: biweekly CHOP, dose-escalated CHOP, dose intensity, G-CSF, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. G. Gobbi, C. Broglia, F. Valentino, C. Mammi, M. Lombardo, F. Merli, S. Luminari, G. Polimeno, A. Riezzo, P. Lambelet, et al.
The role of dose size in a chemotherapy regimen (ProMECE-CytaBOM) for the first-line treatment of large B-cell lymphomas: a randomized trial by the Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi (GISL)
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 676 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. A. Gregory and L. Trumper
Chemotherapy dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: is dose intensity an emerging paradigm for better outcomes?
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2005; 16(9): 1413 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
K. Tobinai and T. Hotta
Clinical Trials for Malignant Lymphoma in Japan
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2004; 34(7): 369 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. S. Portlock
Dose density and dose intensity: where does CHOP go from here?
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2002; 13(9): 1329 - 1330.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.