Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fogli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Del Tacca, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fogli, S.
Right arrow Articles by Del Tacca, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:919-927, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology

Gemcitabine, epirubicin and paclitaxel: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in advanced breast cancer

S. Fogli1, R. Danesi1,+, A. Gennari2, S. Donati2, P. F. Conte2 and M. Del Tacca1

1Division of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, Department of Oncology, Transplants and Advanced Technologies in Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa; 2Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Pisa, Italy

Received 18 June 2001; revised 14 December 2001; accepted 17 January 2002.

Abstract

Background

The objectives of this study were to investigate the disposition of gemcitabine, epirubicin, paclitaxel, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine and epirubicinol, and characterize the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of treatment in patients with breast cancer.

Patients and methods

The drug dispostion in 15 patients who received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (GEP) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, was compared with that of patients treated with epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (EP, n = 6) and epirubicin 90 mg/m2 alone (n = 6). Drug and metabolite levels in plasma and urine were assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography and parameters of drug exposure were related to hematological toxicity by a sigmoid-maximum effect (Emax) model.

Results

Paclitaxel administration significantly increased the epirubicinol area under the concentration–time curve, from 357 ± 146 (epirubicin) to 603 ± 107 (EP) and 640 ± 81 h x {nu}g/ml (GEP), and reduced the renal clearance of epirubicin and epirubicinol by 38 and 52.2% and 34.5 and 53% in GEP- and EP-treated patients, respectively, compared with epirubicin alone. Gemcitabine had no apparent effect on paclitaxel and epirubicin pharmacokinetics, and renal clearance of epirubicin and epirubicinol. The only pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship observed was between neutropenia and the time spent above the threshold plasma level of 0.1 µmol/l (tC0.1) of paclitaxel, with the time required to obtain a 50% decrease in neutrophil count (Et50) of GEP being 7.8 h, similar to that of EP.

Conclusions

Paclitaxel and/or its vehicle, Cremophor EL, interferes with the disposition and renal excretion of epirubicin and epirubicinol; gemcitabine has no affect on epirubicin and paclitaxel plasma pharmacokinetics and renal excretion of epirubicin, while neutropenia is not enhanced by gemcitabine.

Key words: bone marrow, drug interactions, gemcitabine–epirubicin–paclitaxel, pharmacokinetics, toxicity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
L. H. Reddy, H. Khoury, A. Paci, A. Deroussent, H. Ferreira, C. Dubernet, X. Decleves, M. Besnard, H. Chacun, S. Lepetre-Mouelhi, et al.
Squalenoylation Favorably Modifies the in Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Gemcitabine in Mice
Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1570 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
L. Markasz, G. Stuber, B. Vanherberghen, E. Flaberg, E. Olah, E. Carbone, S. Eksborg, E. Klein, H. Skribek, and L. Szekely
Effect of frequently used chemotherapeutic drugs on the cytotoxic activity of human natural killer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 644 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Zielinski, S. Beslija, Z. Mrsic-Krmpotic, M. Welnicka-Jaskiewicz, C. Wiltschke, Z. Kahan, M. Grgic, V. Tzekova, M. Inbar, J. Cervek, et al.
Gemcitabine, Epirubicin, and Paclitaxel Versus Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Central European Cooperative Oncology Group International, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Phase III Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2005; 23(7): 1401 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.