Annals of Oncology 13:614-621, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology
Efficacy of a chemotherapy combination for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours

1Medical Oncology Unit B and 2Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori di Milano (INT), Milano, Italy
Received 8 May 2001; revised 14 September 2001; accepted 25 September 2001.
Objectives
Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are heterogeneous neoplasms for which there is no standard treatment. We have previously proposed an effective polychemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, dacarbazine and epirubicin), which only produced objective responses of brief duration. The present study aimed to assess in a multidisciplinary manner the efficacy of the same regimen at intensified doses in patients with advanced NETs.
Patients and methods
Eighty-two consecutive patients entered the study, of whom 21 had inoperable, locally advanced disease and 61 had metastatic disease. Seventy-two patients were evaluated for objective, biochemical and subjective responses. Response rate, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated based on histotype.
Results
An objective response was observed in 20 patients (intention-to-treat and standard analysis 24.4% and 27.8%, respectively). Complete biochemical and subjective responses were obtained in 25.1% and 38.9% of the cases. The median duration of treatment was 4 months and the objective responses had a median duration of 38 months. After a 60-month follow-up the median TTP and OS were 21 and 38 months, respectively.
Conclusions
Our polychemotherapy regimen is effective, with long duration, and is well tolerated both for gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs, as well as for tumours with a more aggressive clinical behaviour. The new WHO endocrine tumour histotyping, examining also the tumour biology, may give additional information for selecting patients to chemotherapy.
Key words: chemotherapy, chromogranin A, metastatic disease, neuroendocrine tumours
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Oberg, S. Jelic, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group Neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors: ESMO Clinical Recommendation for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(suppl_4): iv150 - iv153. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vilar, R. Salazar, J. Perez-Garcia, J. Cortes, K. Oberg, and J. Tabernero Chemotherapy and role of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in digestive neuroendocrine tumors Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 221 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Konishi, T. Watanabe, J. Kishimoto, K. Kotake, T. Muto, H. Nagawa, and on behalf of the Japanese Society for Cancer of th Prognosis and risk factors of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids: results of a nationwide registry over 15 years Gut, June 1, 2007; 56(6): 863 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ekeblad, A. Sundin, E. T. Janson, S. Welin, D. Granberg, H. Kindmark, K. Dunder, G. Kozlovacki, H. Orlefors, M. Sigurd, et al. Temozolomide as Monotherapy Is Effective in Treatment of Advanced Malignant Neuroendocrine Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2986 - 2991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Bajetta, L. Catena, G. Procopio, E. Bichisao, L. Ferrari, S. Della Torre, S. De Dosso, S. Iacobelli, R. Buzzoni, L. Mariani, et al. Is the new WHO classification of neuroendocrine tumours useful for selecting an appropriate treatment? Ann. Onc., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 1374 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J K Ramage, A H G Davies, J Ardill, N Bax, M Caplin, A Grossman, R Hawkins, A M McNicol, N Reed, R Sutton, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours Gut, June 1, 2005; 54(suppl_4): iv1 - iv16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



