Annals of Oncology 13:599-605, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology
Original Paper |
High-dose versus conventional-dose chemotherapy as first-salvage treatment in patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors: a matched-pair analysis
1Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Klinikum der Philipps Universität, Marburg, Germany; 2Cancer Division Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, Cambridge, UK; 3Medizinische Klinik III, Klinikum Grosshadern der Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany; 4Department of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 5Medizinische Klinik II, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Received 30 May 2001; revised 1 October 2001; accepted 23 October 2001.
Background
The purpose of this study was to compare high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) as first-salvage treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT).
Patients and methods
One hundred and ninety-three patients with relapsed or refractory NSGCT, between 1981 and 1995, were identified from two large databases. In 74 of these, intensification of first-salvage treatment by HDCT was planned. Patients were matched based on primary tumor location, response to first-line treatment, duration of this response and serum levels of the tumor markers, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and
-fetoprotein (AFP). Multivariate analyses were performed using event-free survival and overall survival as primary endpoints.
Results
Full matches on all five factors were found for 38 pairs of patients; for a further 17 pairs, matches on at least four factors could be identified. Hazard ratios in favor of HDCT were obtained between 0.72 and 0.84 [confidence interval (CI) 0.591.01] for event-free survival and between 0.77 and 0.83 (CI 0.600.99) for overall survival, depending on the type of analysis.
Conclusions
The current analysis suggests a benefit from HDCT, with an estimated absolute improvement in event-free survival of between 6 and 12% and in overall survival of between 9 and 11% at 2 years. This benefit is lower than expected from previous phase I/II studies.
Key words: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, matched-pair analysis, non-seminoma, prognosis, salvage therapy, seminoma
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Feldman, G. J. Bosl, J. Sheinfeld, and R. J. Motzer Medical Treatment of Advanced Testicular Cancer JAMA, February 13, 2008; 299(6): 672 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lorch, C. Kollmannsberger, J. T. Hartmann, B. Metzner, I. G.H. Schmidt-Wolf, W. E. Berdel, F. Weissinger, J. Schleicher, G. Egerer, A. Haas, et al. Single Versus Sequential High-Dose Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Germ Cell Tumors: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 25(19): 2778 - 2784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sonpavde, T. E. Hutson, and B. J. Roth Management of Recurrent Testicular Germ Cell Tumors Oncologist, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 51 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Date, K. Kiura, H. Ueoka, M. Tabata, K. Hotta, H. Katayama, I. Kataoka, and M. Tanimoto Induction chemotherapy, surgical resection, and high-dose chemotherapy for mediastinal nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2005; 130(4): 1205 - 1206. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Pico, G. Rosti, A. Kramar, H. Wandt, V. Koza, R. Salvioni, C. Theodore, G. Lelli, W. Siegert, A. Horwich, et al. A randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumours Ann. Onc., July 1, 2005; 16(7): 1152 - 1159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Schmoll, R. Souchon, S. Krege, P. Albers, J. Beyer, C. Kollmannsberger, S. D. Fossa, N. E. Skakkebaek, R. de Wit, K. Fizazi, et al. European consensus on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) Ann. Onc., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 1377 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




