Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lunardi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Esposito, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lunardi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Esposito, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:280-285, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology

Influence of alternate sequences of epirubicin and docetaxel on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of both drugs in advanced breast cancer

G. Lunardi1, M. Venturini2,+, M. O. Vannozzi1, G. Tolino2, L. Del Mastro2, C. Bighin2, G. Schettini1 and M. Esposito1

1Servizio di Farmacologia e Neuroscienze, Laboratorio di Farmacologia Tossicologica and 2Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica I, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genoa, Italy

Received 2 May 2001; revised 20 July 2001; accepted 23 August 2001.

Background

Previously we observed a pharmacokinetic interference of epirubicin elimination when paclitaxel is given in combination in a sequence-dependent manner (i.e. when paclitaxel is administered as first drug). The aim of this study was to determine whether these sequence-dependent pharmacological effects were also evident when epirubicin was combined with docetaxel.

Patients and methods

Patients who received epirubicin 75 mg/m2 or 90 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus followed immediately by docetaxel 70 mg/m2 or 80 mg/m2 over a 1-h infusion, or the opposite sequence, every 3 weeks were eligible for this study. The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel, epirubicin and its metabolites were studied at the first and second cycle of treatment. Pharmacokinetic data were normalised to the lower dose of each drug. Toxicity was recorded at nadir and graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria.

Results

Twelve consecutive patients, each acting as their own control, entered the study. The sequence of drug administration of docetaxel and epirubicin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of the parent anthracycline. Statistically significant lower glucuronidation metabolism of epirubicin was observed in patients who received docetaxel before epirubicin. The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not influenced by the sequence of drug administration. No difference in haematological and non-haematological toxicity was observed in the two sequences of treatment.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetics of the parent anthracycline and of docetaxel were similar between the two schemes of treatment. The metabolic variations observed, i.e. differences in the plasma levels of epirubicin glucuronides, seem not to have clinical relevance.

Key words: combination treatment, docetaxel, epirubicin, pharmacokinetics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
M. J. Zaya, R. N. Hines, and J. C. Stevens
Epirubicin Glucuronidation and UGT2B7 Developmental Expression
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 2097 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Lunardi, M. O. Vannozzi, C. Bighin, L. Del Mastro, I. Stevani, G. Schettini, and M. Venturini
Influence of trastuzumab on epirubicin pharmacokinetics in metastatic breast cancer patients
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 1222 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.