Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fung, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fung, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:1771-1778, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Gemcitabine and doxorubicin for the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase I–II trial

T. S. Yang1, C. H. Wang2,+, R. K. Hsieh3, J. S. Chen1 and M. C. Fung4

1 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei; 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung; 3 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei; 4 Department of Clinical Research, Eli Lilly and Company Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan

Received 19 November 2001; revised 22 April 2002; accepted 13 May 2002

Background:

We determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and then further evaluated the response rate and safety profile of gemcitabine (Gem) plus doxorubicin (Dox) in chemonaïve patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods:

Dose escalation was tested over four dose levels in each 21-day cycle: level 1 (Gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, Dox 30 mg/m2 on day 1), level 2 (Gem/Dox 1250/30), level 3 (Gem/Dox 1250/45) and level 4 (Gem/Dox 1250/60). The MTD was further evaluated in phase II.

Results:

Patients’ characteristics were: 47 men, three women; median age 53 years (range 28–70); Zubrod performance status (PS) scores 0–1 (74%), PS 2 (26%); Okuda stage I (24%) and stage II (76%). Fifteen patients were enrolled in phase I: level 1 (n = 3), level 2 (n = 6), level 3 (n = 6), level 4 (n = 0). Level 2 was identified as the MTD. Dose-limiting toxicities included esophageal bleeding, grade 4 neutropenia and neutropenic fever. Of the 34 patients evaluable for response in phase II (of 35 total), there were four (11.8%) partial responses (95% CI, 0.8% to 22.8%) and six (17.6%) minor responses; nine (26.5%) had stable disease and 15 (44.1%) progressed. Sixteen per cent of patients had a decline of >=50% in {alpha}-fetoprotein levels after treatment. Median survival and progression-free survival were 4.6 months (range 0.3–19.2) and 2.5 months (range 0.2–7.8), respectively, for 35 patients. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included anemia (45.7%), neutropenia (51.4%), thrombocytopenia (25.7%); febrile neutropenia (11.8%) and non-hematological toxicities were mild to moderate.

Conclusions:

Gemcitabine plus doxorubicin produces modest activity and moderate toxicity in this cohort of Chinese patients with advanced HCC.

Key words: chemotherapy, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, hepatocellular carcinoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
Y. YEN, S. SO, M. ROSE, M. W. SAIF, E. CHU, S.-H. LIU, A. FOO, Z. JIANG, T. SU, and Y.-C. CHENG
Phase I/II Study of PHY906/Capecitabine in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Anticancer Res, October 1, 2009; 29(10): 4083 - 4092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Hou, D. Wang, R. Zhang, and H. Wang
Experimental Therapy of Hepatoma with Artemisinin and Its Derivatives: In vitro and In vivo Activity, Chemosensitization, and Mechanisms of Action
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5519 - 5530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.