Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sehouli, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenegger, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sehouli, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenegger, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:1749-1755, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

A phase II study of topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy

J. Sehouli1,+, D. Stengel2, G. Oskay1, O. Camara3, H.-J. Hindenburg4, P. Klare4, J. Blohmer1, G. Heinrich5, D. Elling6, P. Ledwon7 and W. Lichtenegger On behalf of the NOGGO Study Group1

1 Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Charité Virchow University Hospital, Berlin; 2 Institute of Clinical Economics (ICE), Department of Trauma Surgery, Ernst–Moritz–Arndt University Greifswald, Greifswald; 3 Hospital of Hoyerswerda, Hoyerswerda; 4 Gynaecological Practice, Berlin; 5 Gynaecological Practice, Finsterwalde; 6 Oskar–Ziethen Hospital, Berlin; 7 Vivantes Friedrichshain Hospital, Berlin, Germany

Received 13 December 2001; revised 21 March 2002; accepted 10 April 2002

Background:

Second-line chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer who failed platinum and paclitaxel treatment remains a therapeutic challenge. We investigated the toxicity profile and therapeutic efficacy of a novel combination regimen, topotecan plus gemcitabine, in a clinical phase II study.

Patients and methods:

Women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer after platinum and paclitaxel treatment were eligible to participate in this trial. Topotecan was given at an initial dose of 0.5 mg/m2 daily (days 1–5), combined with gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and 600 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, respectively. Precluding good tolerability, this protocol facilitated subsequent dose increases of topotecan up to 1.0 mg/m2. The primary objective was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity, whereas secondary objectives comprised measurable and CA-125 response rates, disease-free and overall survival.

Results:

The twenty-one patients (median age 57 years, range 37–70 years) who were allocated to this trial received a total of 94 courses of chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 20.5 months. Topotecan dosage could be escalated to 0.75 mg/m2 in nine patients and 1 mg/m2 in another two patients. Dose reduction was not necessary in any case. There were no episodes of neutropenic fever, sepsis or chemotherapy-related fatalities. Only one patient developed CTC grade 4 leukopenia after the first treatment cycle, whereas three patients showed grade 3/4 anaemia. Five patients experienced thrombocytopenia grade 4 without clinical sequelae. Non-hematological toxicities were mild and rare. Eleven patients could be evaluated for clinical tumour response, with three complete, and four partial remissions. Two patients each had stable and progressive diseases. The median progression-free survival rate was 8.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3–13.4 months]. The median overall survival rate was 21.1 months (95% CI 14.8–22.1 months).

Conclusions:

Topotecan combined with gemcitabine has a favourable toxicity profile and encouraging efficacy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Key words: combination chemotherapy, gemcitabine, ovarian malignancy, topotecan, toxicity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
Y. ITANI, K. HOSOKAWA, K. ITO, S. TAKEUCHI, T. TABATA, H. TSUBAMOTO, H. FUJITA, M. AKIYAMA, and S. ADACHI
A Phase I/II Study of Docetaxel and Gemcitabine Combination for Chemotherapy-resistant Ovarian Cancer
Anticancer Res, May 1, 2009; 29(5): 1521 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Sehouli, D. Stengel, G. Oskay-Oezcelik, A. G. Zeimet, H. Sommer, P. Klare, M. Stauch, A. Paulenz, O. Camara, E. Keil, et al.
Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3176 - 3182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. J. Herzog
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: How Important Is It to Treat to Disease Progression?
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7439 - 7449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.