Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Whang-Peng, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Whang-Peng, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:108-115, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin, compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, shows similar efficacy while more cost-effective: a randomized phase II study of combination chemotherapy against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated

Y.-M. Chen1,2,+, R.-P. Perng1, Y.-C. Lee1, J.-F. Shih1, C.-S. Lee1, C.-M. Tsai1 and J. Whang-Peng2

1Chest Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang-Ming University; 2Division of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institute, Taiwan

Received 20 April 2001; revised 9 July 2001; accepted 16 August 2001.

Background

Paclitaxel (Taxol) plus carboplatin (PC) has shown activity in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-platinum-containing combination chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG), has also demonstrated reasonable efficacy. Our aim here was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of PC versus PG in chemo-naive, advanced NSCLC patients.

Patients and methods

Ninety (68 male, 22 female) patients were enrolled from August 1999 to August 2000. The performance status was one in 29 patients and two in 16 patients of the PC group, and one in 24 patients and two in 21 patients of the PG group. Seventeen patients had stage IIIb disease and 28 patients stage IV disease in the PC group; 18 patients had stage IIIb disease and 27 patients stage IV disease in the PG group (New International Staging System). Treatment consisted of P 175 mg/m2 and C at AUC = 7 (predicted using measured clearances and the Calvert formula) intravenous infusion (i.v.) on day 1, or P 175 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and G 1000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

Results

In all, 175 cycles of PC and 184 cycles of PG were given in the PC and PG groups, respectively. The median treatment cycle was four cycles in both groups. All the patients were assessable for toxicity and response measurement. There were three complete responses and 15 partial responses (overall 40%) in the PC group, and no complete response, but 18 partial responses (overall 40%) in the PG group. WHO grades 3/4 leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in six (13.3%), seven (15.5%) and five patients (11.1%) in the PC group; and in four (8.9%), six (13.3%) and 0 patients in the PG group, respectively. Two patients in each group suffered from grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Other non-hematological toxicities were mild and few. Median survival time was 14.1 months in the PC group and 12.6 months in the PG group. One-year survival was 50.7% in the PC group and 53.3% in the PG group. The PG group had a higher total expense and expended more days undergoing treatment than the PC group (P = 0.034 and 0.069, respectively).

Conclusions

Both PC and PG combination chemotherapy produce a similar efficacy in the treatment of NSCLC. However, PC is more cost-effective than PG.

Key words: carboplatin, gemcitabine, non-small-cell lung cancer, paclitaxel


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
F. Grossi, M. Aita, C. Defferrari, F. Rosetti, A. Brianti, G. Fasola, O. Vinante, P. Pronzato, and G. Pappagallo
Impact of Third-Generation Drugs on the Activity of First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analytical Approach
Oncologist, May 1, 2009; 14(5): 497 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J-P. Sculier and D. Moro-Sibilot
First- and second-line therapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2009; 33(4): 915 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
Y.-M. Chen, R.-P. Perng, J.-F. Shih, C.-M. Tsai, and J. Whang-Peng
Chemotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients
Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 132 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
L Maslove, N Gower, S Spiro, R Rudd, R Stephens, and P West
Estimation of the additional costs of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Thorax, July 1, 2005; 60(7): 564 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. D'Addario, M. Pintilie, N. B. Leighl, R. Feld, T. Cerny, and F. A. Shepherd
Platinum-Based Versus Non-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of the Published Literature
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 2926 - 2936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. K. Ferguson and A. G. Lehman
Sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy: optimal management strategy using decision analysis techniques
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 76(6): 1782 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. K. Ferguson
Optimal management when unsuspected N2 nodal disease is identified during thoracotomy for lung cancer: cost-effectiveness analysis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 1935 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.