Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seregni, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bombardieri, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seregni, E.
Right arrow Articles by Bombardieri, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 12:S69-S72, 2001
© 2001 European Society for Medical Oncology

Clinical significance of blood chromogranin A measurement in neuroendocrine tumours

E. Seregni1, L. Ferrari1, E. Bajetta2, A. Martinetti1 and E. Bombardieri1

1 Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Milan, Italy
2 Medical Oncology Unit B, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori Milan, Italy

Correspondence to: Dr E. Bombardieri, U.O. Medicina Nucleare, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori via Venezian 1 20133 Milano Italy E-mail: bombardieri{at}istitutotumori.mi.it

Background: Tumour marker measurement gives clinicians useful information for the follow-up and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The currently used tumour markers for NETs are neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and chromogranin A (CgA). The clinical accuracy of these biomarkers depends on histotype and disease extent. CgA is thought to be the optimal marker for most NETs, as it is independent of the biological characteristics of the tumour.

Aim of the study: In this study we investigated the value of CgA assessment with respect to the other biomarkers in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with different types of NETs.

Patients and methods: We measured CgA, NSE, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and urine 5-hydroxy-3-indoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in 290 patients with 127 gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumours, 49 neuroblastomas, 36 lung tumours, 24 medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTCs), 15 pNETs, 12 paragangliomas, 7 Merkel's cell carcinomas (MCC5) and 20 NETs of unknown origin. CgA and 5-HIAA were quantitated by immunoenzymatic assays, while NSE and CEA were deter mined by radioimmunoassays.

Results: The biomarkers' specificity in GEP tumours was 86% for CgA, 100% for NSE, 91% for CEA and 100% for 5-HIAA. The corresponding sensitivity was 68% for CgA, 33% for NSE, 15.4% for CEA and 35% for 5-HIAA. The sensitivity of CgA largely depends on disease extent or presence of functioning tumours and is highest in metastatic and syndromic patients. CgA determination in GEP tumour monitoring is useful to evaluate the response to therapy and to follow up patients with liver metastases. In neuroblastomas the over-all specificity of NSE and CgA was 50% and 83%, respectively. In these tumours NSE sensitivity was close to 90% in all clinical stages, while the sensitivity of CgA depended on clinical stage (50% for stage I and II, 60% for stage III and 100% for stage IV tumours). Also in this type of tumour changes in CgA levels correlated with objective response. In paragangliomas CgA measurement may provide useful clinical information. Measurement of CgA is of use in the diagnosis of lung carcinoids, while its vaiue in MTCs, pNETs and MCCs is very limited.

Conclusions: CgA was confirmed to be the best tumour marker currently available for identifying patients suffering from NETs of the GEP system, lung carcinoids and neuroblastomas. CgA evaluation is recommended in the follow-up of patients with such tumours.

carcinoid, chromogranin A, microcytoma, neuro blastoma, neuroendocrine tumours, paraganglioma, peripheral neuroectodermal tumours


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. H Kulke
Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: a role for targeted therapies?
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 207 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. C. Zatelli, M. Torta, A. Leon, M. R. Ambrosio, M. Gion, P. Tomassetti, F. De Braud, G. Delle Fave, L. Dogliotti, E. C d. Uberti, et al.
Chromogranin A as a marker of neuroendocrine neoplasia: an Italian Multicenter Study
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 473 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.