Annals of Oncology 12:479-486, 2001
© 2001 European Society for Medical Oncology
research-article |
FDG-PET for detection of pulmonary metastases from malignant primary bone tumors: Comparison with spiral CT
1Departments of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, German
2Departments of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, German
3Departments of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Münster, German
Correspondence to: C Franzius, MD, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Münster University, Albert-Schweitzer-Str 33, 48149 Münster, Germany, E-mail franziu{at}uni-muenster.de
Background The purpose was the comparison of positron emission tomography using F-18-fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG-PET) and spiral thoracic CT to detect pulmonary metastases from malignant primary osseous tumors
Patients and methods In 71 patients with histologically confirmed malignant primary bone tumors (32 osteosarcomas, 39 Ewing's sarcomas) 111 FDG-PET examinations were evaluated with regard to pulmonary/pleural metastases in comparison with spiral thoracic CT Reference methods were the clinical follow-ups for 664 months (median 20 months) or a histopathologic analysis
Results In 16 patients (23%) reference methods revealed a pulmonary/pleural metastatic disease FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 0.50, a specificity of 0 98, and an accuracy of 0 87 on a patient based analysis Comparable values for spiral CT were 0 75, 1.00, and 0.94 It was shown that no patient who had a true positive FDG-PET had a false negative CT scan, nor was a pulmonary metastases detected earlier by FDG-PET than by spiral CT
Conclusions There seems to be a superiority of spiral CT in the detection of pulmonary metastases from malignant primary bone tumors as compared with FDG-PET Therefore, at present a negative FDG-PET cannot be recommended to exclude lung metastases However, as specificity of FDG-PET is high, a positive FDG-PET result can be used to confirm abnormalities seen on thoracic CT scans as metastatic
Ewing's sarcoma, FDG-PET, malignant primary bone tumors, osteosarcoma, pulmonary metastases, thoracic CT
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Bestic, J. J. Peterson, and L. W. Bancroft Use of FDG PET in Staging, Restaging, and Assessment of Therapy Response in Ewing Sarcoma RadioGraphics, September 1, 2009; 29(5): 1487 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Strobel, S. Heinrich, U. Bhure, J. Soyka, P. Veit-Haibach, B. C. Pestalozzi, P.-A. Clavien, and T. F. Hany Contrast-Enhanced 18F-FDG PET/CT: 1-Stop-Shop Imaging for Assessing the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1408 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Buck, K. Herrmann, C. M. z. Buschenfelde, M. E. Juweid, M. Bischoff, G. Glatting, G. Weirich, P. Moller, H.-J. Wester, K. Scheidhauer, et al. Imaging Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors with the Proliferation Marker [18F]Fluorodeoxythymidine Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 2970 - 2977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Toner and R. J. Hicks PET for Sarcomas Other Than Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Volker, T. Denecke, I. Steffen, D. Misch, S. Schonberger, M. Plotkin, J. Ruf, C. Furth, B. Stover, H. Hautzel, et al. Positron Emission Tomography for Staging of Pediatric Sarcoma Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Trial J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5435 - 5441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Federman and S. A. Feig PET/CT in Evaluating Pediatric Malignancies: A Clinician's Perspective J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 1920 - 1922. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Tateishi, U. Yamaguchi, K. Seki, T. Terauchi, Y. Arai, and E. E. Kim Bone and Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Preoperative Staging with Fluorine 18 Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and Conventional Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 839 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. U. Gerth, K. U. Juergens, U. Dirksen, J. Gerss, O. Schober, and C. Franzius Significant Benefit of Multimodal Imaging: PET/CT Compared with PET Alone in Staging and Follow-up of Patients with Ewing Tumors J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 1932 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Stacy, R. S. Mahal, and T. D. Peabody Staging of bone tumors: a review with illustrative examples. Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 967 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Franzius, K. U. Juergens, J. Vormoor, and M. B. McCarville PET/CT with Diagnostic CT in the Evaluation of Childhood Sarcoma Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 581 - 582. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Brenner, K. H. Bohuslavizki, and J. F. Eary PET Imaging of Osteosarcoma J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 930 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Franzius, H. E. Daldrup-Link, A. Wagner-Bohn, J. Sciuk, W. L. Heindel, H. Jurgens, and O. Schober FDG-PET for detection of recurrences from malignant primary bone tumors: comparison with conventional imaging Ann. Onc., January 19, 2002; 13(1): 157 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







