Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rustin, G. J.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 12:1705-1709, 2001
© 2001 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Weekly cisplatin and oral etoposide as treatment for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

T. Meyer, A. E. Nelstrop, M. Mahmoudi and G. J.S. Rustin

Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Hospital Northwood, UK

G. J. S. Rustin. M D, Dr. Mount Vernon Hospital, West Herfortshire Hospitals, Department of Medical Oncology, The Clock Tower, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK, E-mail: rustin{at}mtvern.co.uk

Background: Response rates to chemotherapy in relapsed, platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer remain poor. We have explored the effectiveness of weekly cisplatin combined with prolonged oral etoposide in this patient group.

Patients and methods: Forty-two women with relapsed, advanced ovarian cancer were treated with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36 and 43 and oral etoposide 50 mg given from day 1–14 and day 29–43. In those who were responding and tolerating treatment (n = 13) oral etoposide 50 mg was continued for two further cycles (days 1–21 repeated every 28 days). The interval since last platinum containing chemotherapy was > 6 months in 28 patients and ±6 months in 16 patients.

Results: Thirty-six patients were evaluable for response according to CA 125 criteria giving an overall response rate of 44%. The response rate in evaluable patients declined with increasing numbers of previous treatments: 57% with one prior treatment, 42% with two, 40% with three or more. The response rate in patients who had received platinum chemotherapy within six months prior to treatment was 46%. The only significant non-haematological toxicity was nausea and vomiting in 4 patients who experienced greater than grade 2 toxicity. The number of patients experiencing haematological toxicity more than grade 2 was as follows: haemoglobin 3. white blood count 12, platelets 6. Sixteen patients had dose delays and two had dose reductions.

Conclusion We conclude that this short but intensive regimen provides worthwhile response rates, even in those patients who would ordinarily be considered refractory to platinum, and has an acceptable toxicity profile.

CA 125, cisplatin, etoposide, ovarian cancer, relapse


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. S. Rustin, R. C. Bast Jr., G. J. Kelloff, J. C. Barrett, S. K. Carter, P. D. Nisen, C. C. Sigman, D. R. Parkinson, and R. W. Ruddon
Use of CA-125 in Clinical Trial Evaluation of New Therapeutic Drugs for Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2004; 10(11): 3919 - 3926.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. J.S. Rustin
Use of CA-125 to Assess Response to New Agents in Ovarian Cancer Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2003; 21(90100): 187s - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A.E. Guppy and G.J.S. Rustin
CA125 Response: Can it Replace the Traditional Response Criteria in Ovarian Cancer?
Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(5): 437 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.